Chesterton Radio presents The New Cases of Hercule Poirot — from the recollections of Captain Arthur Hastings.
London, 1925.
A wealthy financier boards the morning express from Victoria. His coat, hat, cane, newspaper and dispatch case are found in his reserved compartment. A cup of tea is still warm.
But the passenger has vanished from a train that has not stopped.
And before long, an even more impossible fact emerges.
The missing man is already dead in London.
All the clues are here. Nothing essential will be withheld. But, as Captain Hastings is about to discover, a perfectly true fact can be remarkably misleading when one asks it the wrong question.
This is The Affair of the Empty Compartment.
PART ONE
THE EMPTY COMPARTMENT
Of all the curious circumstances which I encountered during my association with Hercule Poirot, there are certain objects which remain fixed in my memory long after more dramatic things have faded.
A torn envelope. A spot of candle grease. Once, absurdly enough, a button.
But whenever I think of the Mercer affair, I remember a cup of tea.
It was a perfectly ordinary railway cup, thick and white, standing upon an equally ordinary saucer. There was a spoon beside it, and a little milk had been poured in. The train swayed beneath our feet, the spoon gave a faint intermittent rattle against the china, and when I put my fingers against the cup it was still warm.
That warmth seemed to me, at the time, to prove everything.
As Poirot afterwards observed, it proved considerably less than I imagined.
The affair began on a fine morning in the spring of 1925. Poirot and I had occasion to travel from Victoria on a matter which need not concern this narrative. We had arrived earlier than was strictly necessary, owing to Poirot’s conviction that a railway journey which began in haste was morally certain to end in catastrophe.
“My dear Poirot,” I said, as we stood beneath the great glass roof, “the train does not leave for twenty minutes.”
“Exactly.”
“Then why are we here?”
“Because, Hastings, in twenty minutes the train will leave.”
I stared at him.
“There are moments,” I said, “when conversation with you becomes positively exhausting.”
Poirot smiled and brushed an imaginary speck from his sleeve.
Victoria was in full morning tumult around us. Porters hurried past with luggage trucks. Carriage doors slammed. A whistle shrilled somewhere beyond the drifting steam, and announcements rose into the roof and dissolved there into echoes. Families embraced; businessmen consulted watches; a small boy in a sailor suit was dragged firmly away from a chocolate machine by an exasperated nurse.
It was an ordinary London railway station on an ordinary morning.
That fact is worth remembering.
Poirot had just remarked that the English possessed a remarkable talent for creating disorder and then printing regulations for it when a railway official hurried past us toward the barrier.
Another followed him.
There was something in their manner which caught my attention.
“Something’s up,” I said.
Poirot glanced in the same direction.
“Possibly.”
A guard appeared at the open door of one of the first-class carriages of the Channel express. He spoke rapidly to the station official, who shook his head.
A porter joined them.
Then a uniformed railway inspector.
The little group had that unmistakable air which gathers about the first point of a mystery—the air of men who have each discovered a fact which ought not to be possible.
Naturally, I moved nearer.
Poirot followed at a more dignified pace.
“What has happened?” I asked.
The railway inspector turned.
“Nothing to concern passengers, sir.”
“I am not yet a passenger.”
This did not appear to improve my position.
The guard, however, was staring at Poirot.
“Beg pardon, sir,” he said suddenly. “You’re Mr Hercule Poirot, aren’t you?”
Poirot inclined his head.
“I am Hercule Poirot.”
The man’s relief was almost comic.
“Then perhaps you’d have a look, sir. I’ve never seen anything like it.”
The inspector frowned.
“Really, Pike—”
“Man’s gone,” said the guard.
The inspector stopped.
Poirot’s eyebrows rose slightly.
“What man?”
“Sir Claud Mercer.”
The name was familiar even to me.
Sir Claud Mercer had made his fortune in finance during the years before the war and increased it afterwards with a skill which caused admiration in the City and less charitable emotions elsewhere. His name appeared frequently in the newspapers in connection with shipping, mining, industrial combinations and Continental loans. He was reputed to possess an extraordinary memory for figures and an equally extraordinary intolerance of people who did not.
“You mean he has missed the train?” I asked.
“No, sir.”
“Then what do you mean by gone?”
Guard Pike looked at me.
“I mean he was travelling in this compartment, and now he isn’t.”
He pointed through the open door.
I climbed aboard.
The compartment was empty.
At first glance there was nothing extraordinary about it. It was simply a reserved first-class compartment, comfortably upholstered, with luggage racks above and the usual framed notices upon the wall.
Then I began to notice the objects.
A dark travelling coat lay across one corner of the seat.
Beside it rested a soft felt hat and a pair of gloves.
A handsome cane with a silver head leaned against the upholstery.
Upon the opposite seat stood a substantial leather dispatch case.
A newspaper lay beside it, folded neatly as though it had just been purchased.
And on the small table by the window stood a cup of tea.
The train swayed.
The spoon touched the saucer.
Tink.
Tink.
Tink.
Poirot entered behind me.
He did not immediately look at the tea.
That surprised me afterwards.
Instead, his eyes travelled slowly about the compartment—the rack, the seats, the floor, the window, the coat, the hat, the gloves, the cane, the dispatch case and finally the newspaper.
Only then did he look at the cup.
“Tell me,” he said.
Guard Pike stepped inside.
“I began checking the first-class compartments shortly before ten, sir. Routine. Tickets, reservations, that sort of thing. This compartment was reserved for Sir Claud Mercer.”
“And when you came here?”
“Door was shut but not locked. I opened it. Nobody inside.”
“You had seen Sir Claud before?”
“Not this morning, sir. I knew the reservation.”
I interrupted.
“But surely he might simply have gone along the corridor?”
“That’s what I thought.”
Pike’s tone was patient rather than defensive.
“So I checked. Lavatories first. Then the adjoining carriages. I spoke to the attendants and had the train searched.”
“And?”
“Nothing.”
“He could have moved forward.”
“No, sir. Not without being noticed once I began checking. I started from the far end and worked toward this carriage. After I found this empty, we covered the rest.”
I looked toward the window.
“Could he have opened the door and jumped?”
Pike shook his head.
“Not without a fair chance of killing himself.”
“A desperate man might take that chance.”
“He might. But he’d have to open the door first, and there’d likely be some sign of it. And why leave everything behind?”
That was certainly a point.
“Has the train stopped?”
“Not for passengers.”
“Slowed?”
“Under signals, yes. A few minutes. But not stopped at a platform.”
I felt the first pleasant stirring of a theory.
Poirot, who knew me extremely well, noticed it immediately.
“Already, Hastings?”
“I merely observe that a slowing train alters matters.”
“Does it?”
“Obviously.”
“Then we are fortunate to have you.”
I ignored this.
Pike continued.
“We sent word ahead as soon as we could. They’ll have men checking the line.”
Poirot indicated the possessions.
“These are certainly Sir Claud Mercer’s?”
“So I’m told.”
“By whom?”
“The station telephoned through after we reported him missing. The porter at Victoria identified the coat and cane. And the dispatch case has his initials.”
The leather case indeed bore the letters C.M. in discreet gold.
Poirot crouched beside it without touching it.
“It is locked?”
“Yes.”
“Has anyone attempted to open it?”
“No, sir.”
“Good.”
He rose.
“And the ticket?”
Pike produced a small envelope.
“Found under the edge of the seat. Properly passed at Victoria.”
I took it eagerly.
“There you are, Poirot.”
“There I am where, mon ami?”
“The ticket. He went through the barrier.”
“So it appears.”
“And his belongings are here.”
“Undeniably.”
“And the tea—”
I stopped.
Until that moment I had regarded the cup merely as part of the compartment. Now its significance struck me with considerable force.
I touched it.
Warm.
Not merely not cold.
Warm.
“Good Lord.”
Poirot looked at me.
“What is it?”
“The tea.”
“Yes, Hastings. I had observed that it was tea.”
“It is still warm.”
“Ah.”
“Don’t you see?”
“I see that you are about to tell me.”
“He must have been here only a short time before Pike opened the compartment.”
Pike nodded.
“That’s what bothered me, sir.”
“Of course it did! This changes everything.”
Poirot regarded the cup thoughtfully.
“Does it?”
“Really, Poirot! Tea does not remain warm indefinitely.”
“No.”
“Then Mercer was here.”
“Perhaps.”
“Not perhaps. Certainly.”
Poirot turned to the guard.
“Who brought the tea?”
“George Bell. Refreshment attendant.”
“When?”
“Not long before I got here.”
“How long?”
“Ten minutes, perhaps. Less.”
“And did Bell see Sir Claud?”
Pike hesitated.
“I don’t know.”
Poirot’s gaze remained on him.
“Then we shall ask.”
This struck me as pedantic.
The essential fact seemed obvious. Whatever Bell had or had not seen, the tea had been delivered to an occupied compartment and abandoned only minutes before the guard arrived. Sir Claud must therefore have vanished during that narrow interval.
The problem was no longer merely curious.
It was impossible.
We found George Bell farther down the train. He was a thin, energetic man with the permanently harassed expression of one whose livelihood depended upon delivering things to people who had changed their minds.
“Tea for Sir Claud Mercer?” he said. “Yes, sir. I took it along.”
“You saw Sir Claud?” I asked.
Bell frowned.
“Can’t say I did, sir.”
I confess I was disappointed.
“But you delivered the tea.”
“Yes.”
“To his compartment.”
“Yes, sir.”
“And it was ordered for him?”
“That’s right.”
“Then presumably he was there.”
Bell considered this.
“I suppose so.”
Poirot intervened.
“Did you enter the compartment?”
“I opened the door.”
“And?”
“No one there just then.”
I stared at him.
“You left tea in an empty compartment?”
“Yes, sir.”
“Why?”
Bell looked mildly offended.
“Because it had been ordered.”
“But the passenger wasn’t there.”
“Passengers move about, sir.”
This was irritatingly reasonable.
“He might have gone to the lavatory,” Bell continued. “Or along to speak to somebody. If I waited every time a gentleman wasn’t exactly where he’d said he’d be, I’d never finish.”
“Did you call out?”
“Yes.”
“No answer?”
“No, sir.”
“And still you left it?”
“That’s right.”
Poirot’s face remained expressionless.
“At approximately what time?”
Bell gave it some thought.
“Nine-forty-eight or nine-fifty. Thereabouts.”
The express had left Victoria at nine-forty.
I calculated rapidly.
“So eight or ten minutes after departure.”
“About that.”
“And Pike found the compartment empty at ten-three.”
“That sounds right.”
I turned triumphantly to Poirot.
“You see? The interval is even narrower than I thought.”
Poirot did not answer.
Instead he asked Bell, “Who placed the order?”
“For the tea?”
“Yes.”
“Sir Claud, I suppose.”
“You suppose?”
Bell looked uncertain.
“Order came through at Victoria.”
“Before departure?”
“Yes, sir.”
“And you personally received it?”
“No. One of the platform staff passed it along.”
I saw Poirot’s eyes sharpen.
But he merely thanked the man and returned to the compartment.
There we found the railway inspector waiting impatiently.
“Station has confirmed the passenger boarded,” he said. “Porter remembers him distinctly.”
“Excellent,” I said.
Poirot glanced at me.
“For whom?”
I did not answer.
The porter was Albert Pym, and by good fortune he was still at Victoria when the station was telephoned. His account came to us first in summary and later, when arrangements were made for the express to be met and statements taken, in greater detail.
Pym had known Sir Claud by sight.
“Couldn’t mistake him,” he insisted.
He had seen Mercer shortly after nine o’clock, carrying the leather dispatch case and using the silver-headed cane. He had taken charge of another piece of luggage, directed him toward his reserved carriage and received what he described as “a very handsome tip.”
“What did Sir Claud say to you?” Poirot asked.
Pym scratched his cheek.
“Nothing much, sir. Asked if the train was on time. Told me to see to the bag. Said something about refreshment.”
“Tea?”
“Yes, sir. Tea after we were off.”
I glanced at Poirot.
“Did you see his face?” Poirot asked.
Pym looked surprised.
“Of course.”
“Clearly?”
“Well—clearly enough.”
“What does that mean?”
“He was wearing his hat. Had his head turned part of the time. Station busy, wasn’t it?”
“But you are certain it was Sir Claud Mercer?”
“Absolutely.”
“Why?”
The porter stared.
“Because it was him.”
This seemed to me an excellent answer.
Poirot apparently thought otherwise.
“You recognized the gentleman.”
“Yes.”
“The face?”
“Yes. Well—the gentleman. His coat, his stick, the case. I’ve seen him before.”
“How many times?”
“Four or five, perhaps. He’s travelled this way before.”
“And you spoke together?”
“As I told you.”
“Did he address you by name?”
“No.”
“Did you address him by name?”
“’Morning, Sir Claud,’ I said.”
“And he?”
“Gave me the bag.”
Poirot thanked him.
As we moved away I said, “Surely you’re not questioning the identification?”
“I question everything, Hastings.”
“A dangerous habit.”
“Less dangerous than questioning nothing.”
There were, moreover, two other witnesses.
The first was Major Hugh Fenwick, who had been on the platform that morning. Fenwick was a broad-shouldered, grey-haired man with the unmistakable bearing of an old soldier. He admitted seeing Mercer from perhaps thirty yards away.
“Dark coat, felt hat, that damned silver stick of his,” he said. “Mercer all over.”
“You knew him well?” I asked.
“Well enough.”
“Did you speak to him?”
Fenwick’s expression altered.
“No.”
“Why not?”
“Didn’t choose to.”
Something in the manner of this reply struck me, but before I could pursue it Poirot asked quietly:
“You had the opportunity?”
Fenwick looked at him.
“I saw him. He did not see me.”
“And you are certain it was Sir Claud?”
“Quite.”
There was a final witness, Miss Eleanor Vale, daughter of one of Mercer’s business associates.
She had been at Victoria on a private errand and remembered seeing Sir Claud enter the carriage.
“Only for a moment,” she told us. “I was some distance away.”
“But you recognized him?”
“Yes.”
“By his face?” asked Poirot.
She considered.
“I saw him from the side. Mostly his coat, I suppose, and the cane. But there was no reason to doubt it was Sir Claud. I knew he was travelling that morning.”
“Did he speak?”
“No.”
“Did he appear hurried?”
“I don’t think so.”
“Did anything about him strike you as unusual?”
“No.”
She paused.
“At least—I don’t remember anything.”
Poirot let the matter drop.
To my mind, the cumulative evidence was overwhelming.
Three witnesses had seen Mercer at Victoria.
The porter had actually handled his luggage.
His ticket had passed the barrier.
His coat, hat, gloves, cane, newspaper and dispatch case were aboard.
And tea ordered for him had been delivered after the train left.
If ever a man’s presence upon a railway train had been established, surely Sir Claud Mercer’s had.
Yet Sir Claud Mercer was not there.
By early afternoon we had returned to the compartment, which had been kept undisturbed as far as possible.
I stood in the doorway and surveyed it again.
There was something uncanny about those possessions.
The coat lay almost too visibly across the seat.
The hat and gloves rested beside it.
The silver-headed cane stood where anyone entering must notice it.
The dispatch case faced outward, its initials plain.
The newspaper remained folded.
And beside the window stood the cup.
It was cold now.
Somehow that made it more sinister.
Poirot stood in the corridor.
“What do you see, Hastings?”
“A compartment from which a man has disappeared.”
“Yes. That is what you think. But what do you see?”
I sighed.
“Mercer’s coat.”
“Yes.”
“Hat. Gloves. Cane. Dispatch case. Newspaper. Tea.”
“Very good.”
“What else should I see?”
“Nothing.”
He stepped inside.
“That is interesting.”
I watched him examine the newspaper.
He did not unfold it.
“Why don’t you open it?” I asked.
“Why should I?”
“To see whether anything is concealed inside.”
“Ah. You would look for the thing that is hidden.”
“Naturally.”
“And perhaps I look at the thing that is not hidden.”
He replaced the paper exactly where it had been.
I had long ago learned that questions of this sort generally led nowhere until Poirot chose to make them lead somewhere.
Instead I turned my attention to the physical problem.
“The train slowed under signals.”
“So you have said.”
“Suppose Mercer opened the corridor door at that moment.”
“Yes?”
“He could have moved into the adjoining carriage.”
“Which was searched.”
“Then perhaps he went farther.”
“Also searched.”
“Or someone concealed him.”
“Where?”
“That is what we must discover.”
Poirot nodded gravely.
“An admirable method. First invent the hiding place, then search for it.”
I ignored the sarcasm.
“What about the outside door?”
“What about it?”
“If the train slowed sufficiently, a man might jump.”
“Leaving his coat?”
“If he intended to disguise himself.”
“His hat?”
“Naturally.”
“His cane?”
“He wouldn’t want to be recognized.”
“His dispatch case?”
That stopped me.
The case troubled me.
Everyone who knew anything about Sir Claud’s journey agreed that the dispatch case was important. Rumour already suggested that it contained securities of considerable value connected with a Continental transaction.
If Mercer had deliberately disappeared, why leave it?
Unless, of course, the valuables had been removed first.
I said so.
Poirot listened.
“Then you believe Sir Claud planned his disappearance?”
“I say it is possible.”
“And the warm tea?”
“He waited until after it arrived.”
“But Bell found the compartment empty when he delivered it.”
“Then Mercer returned afterwards.”
“Was he seen?”
“Not necessarily.”
“Then he waited somewhere else, returned here, drank some tea, removed whatever was in the case, and then disappeared from the train?”
I hesitated.
Put in that fashion, it did sound rather elaborate.
“Or,” I said, “there was an accomplice.”
“Ah.”
“Someone carried the securities.”
“Naturally.”
“And perhaps helped Mercer off the train during the signal check.”
“Naturally.”
“You needn’t say it like that.”
“I say nothing, Hastings. You construct a most energetic crime. Already we have a passenger who moves from carriage to carriage, an accomplice, a hidden packet of securities and an escape from a moving train.”
“At least I am trying to explain the facts.”
Poirot’s expression softened.
“Yes, my friend. And that is why you are useful to me.”
I was not certain whether I had been complimented.
He looked again at the objects.
“The hat was here?”
“Yes.”
“The gloves?”
“Beside it.”
“And the coat?”
“Exactly where it is now.”
“The cane?”
Pike indicated the place.
“And the newspaper?”
“Untouched, far as I know.”
Poirot turned.
“Untouched?”
“Looked just like that when I opened the door.”
“Folded?”
“Yes.”
Poirot nodded.
He looked at the luggage rack.
Then at the seat.
Then once more at the tea.
His expression had changed very slightly.
I knew that look.
Something offended his sense of order.
“What is it?” I demanded.
“Nothing.”
“That means something.”
“Does it?”
“You have noticed something.”
“I have noticed many things.”
“Something important?”
“Importance, Hastings, is a title we give to facts after we understand them.”
I gave up.
A telephone connection had been arranged with London, and shortly afterwards a railway official came hurrying along the corridor.
“Mr Poirot?”
Poirot turned.
“Yes?”
“There’s a message for you. Scotland Yard.”
I felt a sudden quickening of interest.
“Japp?”
“I believe so, sir. They say it’s urgent.”
We followed the man into an office at the next convenient stop, where the railway authorities had arranged for us to leave the train.
Poirot took the receiver.
“Poirot speaking.”
There was a pause.
“Ah, Japp. Yes.”
Another pause.
Poirot’s face became very still.
I watched him.
“Indeed?”
He listened for perhaps half a minute.
Then he said:
“You are certain of the identification?”
Whatever answer came made him glance at me.
“And the doctor?”
A longer pause.
“I understand.”
He replaced the receiver.
“Well?” I demanded. “Have they found Mercer?”
“Yes.”
For a moment I experienced a ridiculous rush of relief.
“Thank heaven for that. Where was he?”
Poirot did not answer immediately.
“Hastings.”
There was something in his voice which chilled me.
“Sir Claud Mercer has been found in the private records room at the offices of Mercer & Vale.”
“Then he never—”
I stopped.
Poirot continued quietly.
“He is dead.”
I stared at him.
“The police doctor believes that he had been dead for several hours before the Channel express left Victoria.”
Outside the office a locomotive whistled.
For a moment neither of us spoke.
I saw again the dark coat upon the seat.
The silver-headed cane.
The folded newspaper.
And the cup of tea, still warm beneath my hand.
Three people had seen Sir Claud Mercer at Victoria.
One had watched him board the train.
But before that train ever left London, Sir Claud Mercer was already dead.
THE NEW CASES OF HERCULE POIROT
From the Recollections of Captain Arthur Hastings
THE AFFAIR OF THE EMPTY COMPARTMENT
PART TWO
THE DEAD MAN’S TICKET
There are discoveries which simplify a mystery.
The discovery of Sir Claud Mercer’s body did precisely the opposite.
Until that moment we had been confronted with what seemed a particularly ingenious disappearance. A man had boarded a train at Victoria, occupied a reserved first-class compartment, and vanished from it while the train was in motion. His coat, hat, gloves, cane and dispatch case remained behind. So did a cup of tea which, when I touched it, had still been warm.
Whatever else might be said of the affair, it possessed a certain shape.
Then came the telephone message from London.
Sir Claud Mercer had been found dead in the private records room of Mercer & Vale.
And according to the doctor who had examined him, he had almost certainly been dead before the Channel express left Victoria.
I remember looking at Poirot and feeling, absurdly, that the entire railway had shifted beneath my feet.
“But that’s impossible.”
Poirot replaced the receiver carefully.
“You use that word very readily, Hastings.”
“What else would you call it?”
“A fact which does not agree with another fact.”
“That is practically the definition of impossible.”
“No. It is the definition of interesting.”
We returned to London at once.
Inspector Japp met us at the offices of Mercer & Vale shortly after two o’clock.
The firm occupied a narrow but imposing building in the City, one of those places in which polished brass and heavy doors seemed designed to assure a visitor that money, once admitted, would never be permitted to escape.
Inside, the atmosphere was subdued.
Clerks moved quietly between desks. Telephones rang and were answered in lowered voices. Somewhere a typewriter struck steadily for a few moments and then stopped as though its operator had suddenly remembered that the senior partner had been murdered upstairs.
Japp was waiting near the entrance to the private offices.
He greeted Poirot with the mixture of affection and impatience that usually marked their meetings.
“Well, here we are again.”
Poirot bowed.
“My good Japp.”
“And you, Captain Hastings.”
“Japp.”
He looked from one of us to the other.
“You’ve managed to pick up an awkward one.”
“I had nothing to do with picking it up,” I protested. “The fellow vanished almost under our noses.”
Japp gave me a dry look.
“And now he’s turned up dead several miles away.”
“That,” I said, “is precisely the difficulty.”
“I’d noticed.”
Poirot smiled.
“Tell us.”
Japp’s manner became businesslike.
“Body found at twelve-ten. Private records room at the back. He’d been pushed—or fallen—into a deep recess behind a row of deed boxes. Door was locked when they found it, but there’s nothing mysterious about the lock. Ordinary key. Several people in the firm had access.”
“And the cause of death?”
“Blow to the head.”
“With what?”
“We think this.”
He led us into Sir Claud Mercer’s private office.
It was an impressive room without being comfortable. Dark wood. A broad desk. Two straight-backed chairs for visitors. Shelves of ledgers. A large clock upon the mantel ticking with an almost judicial steadiness.
On a side table rested a heavy bronze ornament.
At first glance I took it for a decorative paperweight, though it was larger than any paperweight I would have chosen to keep upon my own desk.
Japp indicated it.
“Bronze desk weight. Blood and hair on one edge. Doctor thinks it fits.”
Poirot did not touch it.
“He was struck here?”
“Not necessarily. The body was found in the records room next door. Could have happened there. Could have happened in here and been moved.”
“Any signs of struggle?”
“Not much.”
Japp led us through another door.
The private records room was smaller and darker than the office. Steel cupboards lined one wall. The other was occupied by shelves of bound files and deed cases, some of them clearly undisturbed for years.
At the far end stood the recess.
It was deeper than I had imagined, partly hidden by tall cases and stacked boxes.
I stepped nearer.
“So he lay in there all morning?”
“So far as we know.”
The thought gave the ordered room an unpleasant quality.
Outside, clerks had worked, telephones had rung, appointments had been kept.
And all the while Sir Claud Mercer, whose habits and decisions apparently governed the entire place, had lain dead a few feet away.
Poirot stood motionless.
“When was he last certainly known to be alive?”
“That,” said Japp, “is where it becomes awkward.”
He opened his notebook.
“Mercer came in unusually early. About seven-forty-five. One of the junior clerks saw him arrive. He asked for certain ledgers to be brought to his private room.”
“Which ledgers?”
“Company accounts. Mostly investment accounts.”
Poirot glanced at him.
“Mostly?”
“We’re still sorting that.”
“And after seven-forty-five?”
“His secretary, Martin Rooke, arrived shortly after eight.”
“Rooke saw him?”
“Says he did.”
“What does Rooke say occurred?”
“Ordinary morning business. Letters, appointments, Continental arrangements. Says Mercer was preparing to travel.”
“And when did Rooke last see him?”
“A little before nine, according to Rooke.”
I seized upon this.
“Then the doctor may simply be wrong.”
Japp closed the notebook.
“The doctor won’t swear to the minute, naturally. But his view is that Mercer died much earlier than the station sightings. Certainly before the train left. Quite probably before nine.”
“Probably?”
“That’s the best you’ll get.”
Poirot nodded approvingly.
“A sensible doctor.”
Japp looked at him.
“That meant as a compliment?”
“Entirely.”
I stared into the recess.
“Then if Rooke saw Mercer alive shortly before nine—”
“Either Rooke is mistaken about the time,” Japp said, “the doctor is off in his estimate, or someone’s lying.”
“That narrows it beautifully,” I said.
Poirot turned.
“Does it?”
Before I could answer, a man appeared in the doorway.
He was perhaps thirty-eight, slim, neat and dressed with an unobtrusive correctness that made it difficult afterwards to remember exactly what he had worn.
“Inspector?”
Japp looked around.
“Ah. Mr Rooke.”
Martin Rooke stepped into the room.
His face was pale, but his movements were controlled.
“I’ve had the bank send confirmation.”
“Good.”
He handed Japp a slip of paper.
“My appointment there was at ten-fifteen. I thought it might assist with the timing.”
Japp studied it.
“Seems straightforward.”
Rooke turned toward us.
Japp made the introductions.
Rooke inclined his head.
“Mr Poirot. Captain Hastings. I understand you were on the train.”
“We were,” I said.
His expression altered for the first time.
“Then you saw the compartment?”
“Yes.”
“The coat? The cane? His case?”
“All of them.”
“And the tea?”
I looked at him.
“Yes.”
Rooke gave a faint shake of the head.
“It is extraordinary.”
He did not sound theatrical.
If anything, his tone was too practical for theatre.
“I arranged the reservation myself,” he continued. “The carriage, the ticket, the papers for the journey. Sir Claud disliked leaving such details to chance.”
Poirot watched him.
“You arranged everything?”
“Everything connected with his business travel.”
“The dispatch case also?”
Rooke hesitated for perhaps half a second.
“I assembled the papers he requested. Sir Claud himself dealt with the securities.”
Japp glanced up.
“What securities?”
“The bearer securities for the Armand transaction.”
“You knew they were in the case?”
“I assumed so. Sir Claud told me they would travel with him.”
“What value?”
Rooke named a figure which made me whistle softly.
He looked faintly embarrassed.
“In our business, Captain Hastings, numbers tend to sound more dramatic than they are.”
“Not to me.”
Poirot’s gaze remained on him.
“At what time did you leave this building?”
“About nine-five.”
“And then?”
“I took a cab to the bank.”
“For the ten-fifteen appointment?”
“Yes.”
“An hour and ten minutes?”
Rooke looked at him without offence.
“I made two calls on the way and stopped for coffee.”
“Where?”
He named a café and another office.
Japp made a note.
Poirot said only:
“Thank you.”
Rooke glanced toward the recess.
“I should mention one thing. Sir Claud was deeply particular about his railway arrangements. If the case and his travelling things were in that compartment, then he intended to travel.”
The words were perfectly natural.
At the time I found them reassuring.
Poirot merely said:
“Indeed.”
We returned to Mercer’s office.
A woman was waiting there.
She was in her early forties, plainly dressed, with a composed expression and a stack of papers held firmly against her chest.
“Miss Beatrice Cole,” Japp said. “Senior ledger clerk.”
She acknowledged us without fuss.
“I understand you require the accounts Sir Claud was examining this morning.”
“Yes,” said Japp.
She placed the papers on the desk.
“He requested these three ledgers yesterday afternoon. I had them sent up before he arrived.”
“Anything unusual about that?”
Miss Cole considered.
“He sometimes worked early.”
“But?”
“Not usually on these accounts.”
Poirot’s attention sharpened.
“What is unusual about them?”
“They cross several investment vehicles which are normally reviewed separately.”
Japp frowned.
“Meaning?”
“It means someone would need a reason to compare them side by side.”
“Did Mercer have a reason?”
“He did not tell me.”
She began to leave.
Poirot said:
“Mademoiselle.”
She stopped.
“You discovered the body?”
“No. I discovered that the records room was locked.”
“At what time?”
“Approximately eleven-thirty-five. Sir Claud had not signed several documents. I came looking for him.”
“You expected him to be here?”
She looked faintly puzzled.
“I expected him to be on the train.”
“Yet you searched the records room?”
“I searched everywhere.”
“And why did the locked door interest you?”
She hesitated.
“Because Sir Claud disliked locked internal doors.”
There was something in her manner which made me feel she had not told us everything.
Japp evidently noticed it as well.
“You’ve something else, Miss Cole?”
“No.”
The answer came too quickly.
Japp looked at her steadily.
She met his gaze.
Then she said:
“Nothing relevant.”
Which, as I remarked to Poirot afterwards, is one of the most suspicious sentences in the English language.
He agreed.
Our next visitor was Julian Mercer.
If Sir Claud had represented discipline, Julian represented everything likely to irritate it.
He was handsome, fashionably dressed and possessed that easy charm which often causes elderly relatives to predict disaster.
He received the news of his uncle’s death with a controlled shock that I could not immediately decide was genuine.
“You quarrelled with him Saturday night,” Japp said without preamble.
Julian’s eyes moved toward him.
“Who told you?”
“So you did?”
“My uncle quarrelled with everyone.”
“About money?”
“That narrows it less than you imagine.”
“How much do you owe?”
Julian smiled without humour.
“Would you like the precise figure or merely enough to establish that I’m a wastrel?”
“The precise figure.”
He gave it.
It was considerable.
Japp whistled softly.
Julian glanced at me.
“You see, Captain Hastings? Inspector Japp and I are united in our appreciation of numbers.”
Poirot said:
“Your uncle had threatened to cut you off?”
Julian’s expression hardened.
“He threatened it approximately once a month.”
“Did you expect to inherit?”
“I assumed I would.”
“Assumed?”
“Sir Claud changed his intentions according to who had annoyed him last.”
“And had you annoyed him?”
“Yes.”
“How?”
Julian looked toward the window.
“A private matter.”
Japp said:
“You’ll have to do better than that.”
“Then arrest me.”
“Don’t tempt me.”
Julian laughed, though without much amusement.
Poirot regarded him with interest.
“Where were you this morning between eight and nine?”
Julian turned back.
“At my rooms.”
“Alone?”
“Yes.”
The answer came lightly.
Too lightly, I thought.
Another liar.
The case seemed increasingly rich in them.
Eleanor Vale came next.
She was the young woman who had already told us at the station that she had seen Sir Claud board.
In the sombre surroundings of Mercer & Vale she appeared rather different—less like a casual traveller and more like someone accustomed to having her intelligence underestimated.
“My father is one of the partners,” she explained. “Sir Claud preferred that I keep out of business matters.”
“And did you?” I asked.
“No.”
I liked her immediately.
Japp asked about the morning.
“You were at Victoria.”
“Yes.”
“For what purpose?”
“To meet someone.”
“Who?”
“A friend.”
Japp waited.
She did not enlarge upon it.
“You saw Sir Claud board?”
“I saw him going into the carriage.”
“You’re certain?”
“I believed it was Sir Claud.”
I noticed the wording.
Japp did too.
“You believed?”
She looked mildly annoyed.
“I knew his coat. His cane. His manner of walking. I knew he was travelling. Who else should it have been?”
That seemed unanswerable.
Poirot said:
“You spoke with him?”
“No.”
“He spoke with you?”
“No.”
“But you had no doubt.”
“None at the time.”
“And now?”
She glanced toward the closed door of the records room.
“Now I am being told he was already dead.”
There was a faint tremor beneath the composure.
Poirot did not press her.
Instead he asked:
“Did Sir Claud approve of your being involved in the firm?”
She gave him a direct look.
“No.”
“Did this cause quarrels?”
“Frequently.”
“Did you hate him?”
“No.”
“Resent him?”
“Yes.”
I admired the answer.
Poirot appeared to do so as well.
Major Fenwick proved more difficult.
He came in angry.
“I have already told the railway people what I saw.”
Japp folded his arms.
“Now you can tell me.”
Fenwick’s jaw tightened.
“I saw Mercer on the platform at Victoria.”
“Why were you there?”
“Business.”
“With Mercer?”
“No.”
The lie was poor.
Even I could see it.
Japp evidently had no intention of letting him escape with it.
“You knew he would be travelling.”
“I knew.”
“How?”
Fenwick hesitated.
“Common knowledge.”
“Among whom?”
“People who had dealings with him.”
“You had dealings with him?”
“Once.”
“Not now?”
“No.”
“You lost money because of him?”
Fenwick’s expression darkened.
“My company collapsed because Mercer withdrew his backing at the worst possible moment.”
“That sounds like a reason to dislike him.”
“I did dislike him.”
“Enough to kill him?”
Fenwick stepped forward.
“No.”
The single word had the force of a challenge.
Japp remained unmoved.
“Did you speak to him at Victoria?”
“No.”
“Why not?”
“I changed my mind.”
“About what?”
Fenwick said nothing.
Poirot intervened gently.
“You had gone there to speak with him?”
Fenwick looked at him for a long moment.
“Yes.”
“Yet when you saw him, you did not.”
“No.”
“Why?”
Another silence.
Then:
“I decided it would accomplish nothing.”
I suspected there was considerably more behind that answer.
Japp suspected the same thing.
But for the moment we let him go.
Dr Lucien Armand arrived late in the afternoon.
He was a compact, elegant man whose English possessed only the slightest Continental inflection.
Unlike the others, he seemed less concerned with Mercer himself than with the leather dispatch case.
“The securities must be found,” he said.
Japp looked at him.
“That important?”
“Very.”
“To whom?”
“To several people.”
“Including you?”
Armand smiled thinly.
“Inspector, a large financial transaction is rarely important to only one man.”
“What exactly was Mercer carrying?”
Armand gave us the outline.
The securities were bearer instruments forming collateral in a Continental arrangement whose collapse, if mishandled, could affect more than Mercer & Vale.
“So if someone stole them,” I said, “they could be converted?”
“With difficulty. But yes.”
“And Mercer intended to carry them personally?”
“He trusted himself.”
Poirot said:
“More than his staff?”
“Sir Claud trusted systems. People he regarded as necessary components of them.”
An interesting phrase.
I thought of Rooke.
“So whoever killed Mercer,” I said, “could have killed him for the securities.”
Armand considered.
“It is possible.”
“And then used the railway journey to carry them away.”
“Also possible.”
Poirot looked at me.
“You advance.”
“I merely follow the evidence.”
“Always a dangerous occupation.”
Before I could answer, Japp re-entered with a constable carrying Sir Claud Mercer’s dispatch case.
It had been sealed by the railway authorities.
Japp set it on the desk.
“Now perhaps we learn something.”
Rooke had provided the key from Mercer’s office.
Japp opened the locks.
There was something almost ceremonial in the moment.
We had all come to regard the case as containing the hidden centre of the affair.
Japp lifted the lid.
Inside were papers.
Nothing more.
He began removing them.
Company circulars.
Printed forms.
Several typed memoranda.
A stack of blank sheets.
More circulars.
I stared.
“That’s all?”
Japp continued.
One memorandum was folded inward around another sheet. He placed it with the rest without comment.
No packet of securities emerged.
No sealed envelope.
No bearer bonds.
No valuables of any kind.
Japp looked at Rooke.
“You said the securities were in here.”
Rooke had gone very pale.
“I said Sir Claud intended to carry them.”
“You thought they were here?”
“Yes.”
“Could he have carried them separately?”
“He could. But I cannot imagine why.”
Armand stepped forward.
“They were not in the case?”
“No.”
His composure cracked.
“Then they have been taken.”
I looked at Poirot.
There, surely, was the motive.
Mercer murdered.
Securities stolen.
The train journey somehow used to create confusion.
Perhaps an accomplice had boarded in Mercer’s place. Perhaps another passenger had removed the securities before the disappearance. Perhaps the dead man’s belongings had been placed aboard deliberately.
My thoughts were moving quickly now.
Japp appeared to be following the same path.
“If Mercer was killed before leaving this office,” he said, “the killer had access to the securities here. Then he gets Mercer’s effects onto the train. Makes it look as if Mercer travelled. Maybe somebody aboard takes the papers off during the run.”
“That would explain the disappearance,” I said.
Poirot looked at me.
“Would it?”
“At least part of it.”
“Which part?”
“The man seen boarding.”
“Ah.”
I stopped.
He had caught me again.
Later, in the outer office, Poirot asked to see the ticket recovered from the compartment.
Japp handed it over.
Poirot gave it to me.
“What do you see?”
“A railway ticket.”
“I am reassured.”
“It was clipped at Victoria.”
“Yes.”
“That proves Mercer passed the barrier.”
Poirot looked at me.
“What precisely does the ticket prove, Hastings?”
I frowned.
“That someone presented it at the barrier.”
“Good.”
I stared at him.
“You are splitting hairs.”
“Perhaps.”
“Three people saw Mercer.”
“Before the train departed.”
“Yes.”
“His ticket passed the barrier.”
“Yes.”
“His possessions were in the compartment.”
“Yes.”
“The tea was delivered after departure.”
“Yes!”
“And Sir Claud Mercer was dead in London.”
“That is exactly the difficulty.”
Poirot smiled faintly.
“Then do not complain when I examine the difficulty.”
Japp approached with another paper.
“Got confirmation from the bank.”
He held it up.
“Rooke was there at ten-fifteen. Signed documents in front of two clerks. No question of identity.”
I glanced toward the secretary’s office.
“That clears him of anything aboard the train.”
“Pretty much,” said Japp.
Poirot said nothing.
The office clock struck five.
For the next hour statements arrived and contradicted one another with impressive efficiency.
Pym at Victoria remained adamant.
He had seen Mercer.
He had spoken to him.
He had taken his luggage.
Major Fenwick remained equally certain.
He had seen Mercer on the platform.
Eleanor Vale insisted that the man entering the reserved carriage had been Sir Claud.
The ticket had been properly passed.
The coat, hat, gloves, cane and dispatch case were found aboard.
And yet the medical evidence, combined with the office chronology, became steadily less flexible.
Mercer had almost certainly died during the early part of the morning.
Before the station sightings.
Before the ticket was clipped.
Before the figure with the silver-headed cane entered the train.
We gathered at last in Sir Claud’s private office.
Japp stood by the desk with his notebook open.
Miss Cole remained nearby, silent and watchful.
Rooke had returned to his own office to answer telephone calls.
Julian had gone.
Fenwick had departed in a temper.
Eleanor had left quietly.
The remaining papers from the dispatch case lay upon the desk.
Japp rubbed his chin.
“There are two possibilities.”
Poirot sat opposite him.
“Only two?”
“Either the doctor’s wrong about the time of death—”
“Possible.”
“—or three people are wrong about seeing Mercer.”
I said:
“Not merely three people. The ticket. The belongings.”
Japp nodded.
“Exactly.”
Poirot picked up the clipped ticket.
He turned it once between his fingers.
“So,” Japp said, “which do you prefer?”
Poirot looked at him.
“I prefer facts.”
“Facts are what I’ve just given you.”
“No, mon ami. You have given me interpretations of facts.”
Japp sighed.
“I knew we’d get there sooner or later.”
I went to the window.
City traffic moved below us through the early evening.
“I still say the station evidence is overwhelming.”
Poirot said nothing.
“Pym knew Mercer.”
“Yes.”
“Fenwick knew Mercer.”
“Yes.”
“Miss Vale knew Mercer.”
“Yes.”
“All three saw him.”
“Yes.”
“His ticket went through the barrier.”
“Yes.”
“His things were on the train.”
“Yes.”
“Then he boarded.”
Poirot looked at me.
I felt, rather than saw, that small flicker of amusement in his eyes.
“What?”
“You are very certain, Hastings.”
“I have reason to be.”
Japp closed his notebook.
“Well, if Mercer was dead here and Mercer boarded there, we’re left with nonsense.”
Poirot placed the ticket carefully upon the desk.
“Perhaps.”
Japp eyed him.
“You’ve got another possibility?”
Poirot rose.
“A third possibility is often concealed by two very convincing ones.”
“What third possibility?”
Poirot adjusted his cuffs.
“I do not yet say.”
I stared at him.
“Then what do you say?”
He looked from Japp to me.
Only the ticking of the clock disturbed the room.
Finally he said:
“I say that tomorrow we must ask these witnesses not what they believed they saw, but what they actually saw.”
Japp frowned.
I felt a sudden chill.
Outside that office lay London, rational and ordinary.
At Victoria Station three respectable people remained quite certain of what they had witnessed.
Albert Pym had dealt with Sir Claud Mercer.
Major Fenwick had seen him upon the platform.
Eleanor Vale had watched him climb into his carriage.
And yet, before any of those things had happened, Sir Claud Mercer had apparently been lying dead in a dark records room in the City.
The conclusion was absurd.
Nevertheless, at the end of that first day, it was the conclusion the evidence forced upon us.
Three independent witnesses had watched a dead man board the Channel express.
THE NEW CASES OF HERCULE POIROT
From the Recollections of Captain Arthur Hastings
THE AFFAIR OF THE EMPTY COMPARTMENT
PART THREE
THREE MINUTES UNDER SIGNAL
There is a particular danger in possessing three minutes.
One minute is too little to be useful. Ten minutes invite too many possibilities. But three minutes—three precise, measured minutes—are exactly enough to tempt an orderly mind into mischief.
I speak, of course, of my own.
By breakfast the following morning I had convinced myself that the whole of the Mercer affair turned upon the brief slowing of the Channel express under signals shortly after ten o’clock.
The train had not stopped at a platform.
It had not even halted completely.
But between approximately ten-five and ten-eight it had slowed considerably while held beneath adverse signals.
Three minutes.
A man might accomplish a surprising amount in three minutes.
I said as much to Poirot.
He was sitting opposite me, attending to his breakfast with an air of concentration which suggested that the proper disposition of toast and coffee was at least as important as murder.
“Hastings,” he said, “you have been awake since six.”
“How do you know that?”
“You have drawn the railway line three times.”
I looked at the sheet of paper beside my plate.
“I am reconstructing the route.”
“So I observe.”
“You don’t seem very interested.”
“In the route?”
“In the escape.”
Poirot spread a small quantity of marmalade upon his toast.
“My friend, before I become interested in an escape, I like to know that there has been one.”
“There must have been.”
“Must?”
I put down my pencil.
“Mercer’s belongings were on the train. His ticket had been clipped. Three people saw him at Victoria. The compartment was empty by ten-three. The train slowed at ten-five. If someone left it, that was the opportunity.”
Poirot nodded.
“A beautiful chain.”
“Exactly.”
“So beautiful that you must be careful.”
I stared at him.
“That is thoroughly unreasonable.”
“Beauty is often unreasonable.”
He drank his coffee.
I returned to my sketch.
The more I studied it, the more convinced I became.
Suppose the man seen at Victoria—Mercer, or whoever had been involved in the affair—had remained hidden until after the first search began.
Suppose he had reached an exterior door.
At low speed, an agile man could have descended.
A railway embankment, a service road, perhaps another line nearby.
Or an accomplice might have been waiting.
The missing securities supplied motive enough.
I was still developing this theory when Japp arrived.
He entered without ceremony and placed a packet of papers upon the table.
“You’re going to like this, Captain Hastings.”
“I usually do when people begin that way.”
“Major Fenwick.”
Poirot looked up.
“What of him?”
“The anonymous letters.”
I sat forward.
“You traced them?”
“Better. He admitted writing them.”
That was something.
Japp opened the packet and removed several sheets.
The letters were angry, sometimes bitter, but not incoherent. They accused Sir Claud Mercer of having ruined honest men while protecting his own reputation and threatened to expose details of a wartime procurement dispute unless Mercer “made amends.”
“Pretty language,” Japp said, “but the meaning’s clear.”
“Blackmail?” I asked.
“Maybe. Fenwick says exposure, not money.”
“And he was at Victoria.”
“Exactly.”
I looked at Poirot.
He was not smiling now.
Japp continued.
“We’ve got Fenwick coming in at eleven.”
I tapped the railway sketch.
“And the signals?”
Japp glanced down.
“What’s all this?”
“The key to the disappearance.”
He studied the paper.
“You mean the slowing?”
“Three minutes.”
Japp considered.
“Could be.”
I felt vindicated.
Poirot said:
“Ah.”
Japp looked at him.
“You disagree?”
“I have not yet agreed.”
“That’s not the same thing.”
“It is sometimes more useful.”
We met Fenwick at Mercer & Vale.
If he had seemed hostile the previous afternoon, he was positively grim that morning.
He stood in the boardroom rather than sit, shoulders squared, hat in hand.
Japp placed the letters on the table.
Fenwick looked at them without expression.
“These yours?”
“Yes.”
“No argument?”
“No.”
“You wrote all of them?”
“Yes.”
“Why deny it yesterday?”
“I did not deny it.”
“You neglected to mention it.”
Fenwick’s mouth tightened.
“I did not see that it concerned the murder.”
Japp gave him a long look.
“You sent threatening letters to a man who was subsequently found with his skull smashed in.”
“They were not threats of murder.”
“That’s a distinction I prefer to make myself.”
Fenwick’s face coloured.
Poirot intervened.
“What did Sir Claud do to you, Major?”
Fenwick turned.
For the first time his anger appeared to move beneath the surface rather than sit upon it.
“He destroyed my firm.”
“Deliberately?”
“He withdrew support at the exact moment he knew it would break us.”
“Why?”
“Because he could.”
“That is not a business reason.”
Fenwick laughed once.
“No. It is the reason men like Mercer rarely put in writing.”
He paced to the window.
“During the war my works took government contracts. We expanded too quickly. Everyone did. Afterward there were questions—costs, materials, deliveries. Nothing criminal. Nothing I was ashamed of. But Mercer had financed part of the expansion. Years later, when I needed him to continue, he used those old matters as leverage.”
“And withdrew?” Poirot asked.
“Yes.”
“You blamed him.”
“I still do.”
Japp tapped the letters.
“And you threatened to expose him.”
“I threatened to expose what he had done.”
“At Victoria?”
Fenwick turned.
There was the smallest pause.
“Yes.”
“So you did go there to confront him.”
“Yes.”
“Why lie?”
“I did not want this dragged through the newspapers.”
Japp smiled without warmth.
“Murder has an inconvenient way of doing that.”
Fenwick ignored him.
“I intended to speak with Mercer before he boarded. I had decided that if he would not answer privately, I would publish everything.”
“And then?”
“I saw him.”
“Where?”
“Across the platform.”
“How far?”
Fenwick frowned.
“I don’t know. Thirty yards. Perhaps a little less.”
“What did you see?”
Fenwick looked irritated.
“I saw Mercer.”
Poirot said quietly:
“Describe him.”
Fenwick turned toward him.
“You know what he looked like.”
“I ask what you saw.”
For a second Fenwick seemed about to refuse.
Then he sighed.
“The dark travelling coat. Felt hat. Cane. That ridiculous silver-headed thing.”
“His face?”
“Partly.”
“Clearly?”
“No.”
“His eyes?”
Fenwick stared.
“Good God, no.”
“Did he speak?”
“No.”
“Did he look at you?”
“No.”
“But you knew him.”
“Of course I knew him.”
“How?”
Fenwick’s temper returned.
“I had known the man twenty years.”
Poirot inclined his head.
“Yet on that morning he did not speak to you, did not look at you, and you saw his face only partly.”
Fenwick’s jaw tightened.
“I knew his coat. His cane. His walk.”
“And you knew he was expected at Victoria.”
Silence.
“Yes.”
Poirot smiled faintly.
“Thank you.”
Fenwick looked at Japp.
“Is that all?”
“For now.”
He left.
As soon as the door closed, I said:
“He’s our best suspect.”
Japp nodded.
“Certainly looks ugly.”
“Threats, motive, presence at the station.”
“And he admits going there to confront Mercer,” Japp added.
Poirot adjusted one of the papers on the table.
“You both admire ugliness when it is neatly arranged.”
I frowned.
“Do you not suspect him?”
“I suspect many things.”
“That is not an answer.”
“It is the only honest one.”
Before I could continue, Eleanor Vale entered.
She had been asked to return because Japp had found discrepancies in the statements she and Julian Mercer had given about the previous morning.
Julian arrived five minutes later.
They avoided looking at one another.
That fact interested me immediately.
Japp wasted no time.
“Mr Mercer, yesterday you told us you were at your rooms between eight and nine.”
“Yes.”
“And Miss Vale, you said you were on your way to Victoria to meet a friend.”
“That is correct.”
“Name?”
Eleanor hesitated.
Japp turned to Julian.
“Were you alone?”
Julian gave a short laugh.
“No.”
Eleanor closed her eyes for the briefest instant.
Japp noticed.
“So.”
Julian said:
“This is absurd.”
“Usually means I’ve reached something.”
“It means the matter has nothing to do with my uncle.”
“Then you won’t mind explaining.”
Julian looked toward Eleanor.
She gave the smallest nod.
He exhaled.
“I was with Miss Vale.”
I confess that I had expected something more sinister.
Japp did not relax.
“Where?”
“At her aunt’s house in Belgravia.”
“At what time?”
“From roughly half past seven until nearly nine.”
Eleanor added:
“My aunt is away.”
Japp folded his arms.
“And why exactly were you two meeting secretly at half past seven in the morning?”
Julian looked annoyed.
Eleanor, by contrast, suddenly seemed calmer.
“Because we are engaged.”
There was a small silence.
Japp glanced from one to the other.
“Engaged.”
“Yes.”
“Secretly.”
“Yes.”
“Why?”
“Sir Claud opposed it,” Julian said.
“That puts it mildly,” Eleanor added.
Julian gave her a look which, despite the circumstances, contained genuine affection.
“My uncle threatened to cut me off completely.”
“And you lied to protect the engagement?”
“Yes.”
Japp said:
“You understand how that looks.”
“Perfectly,” Eleanor replied.
“You also understand that two people who coordinate one lie may be suspected of coordinating another.”
Julian’s face hardened.
“We did not kill him.”
“No one said you did.”
“You are thinking it.”
“That’s my profession.”
Poirot had remained quiet.
Now he said:
“Mademoiselle Vale, when you were at Victoria, you saw the man you believed to be Sir Claud enter his carriage?”
“Yes.”
“Please tell me again.”
She frowned.
“I have told you twice.”
“Tell me a third time.”
Eleanor glanced at Japp.
He nodded.
She began.
“I was crossing toward the other platform when I saw him ahead of me. He was carrying the silver-headed cane. He reached the carriage and went up.”
“How?”
She stopped.
“How?”
“Yes.”
“I don’t understand.”
“You saw him mount the step?”
“Yes.”
“With difficulty?”
She frowned more deeply.
“No.”
Poirot’s eyes sharpened.
“No?”
“He simply stepped up.”
I looked at him.
He said:
“That interested you?”
“I don’t know.”
Eleanor seemed genuinely puzzled.
“Yesterday I thought there was something odd about it. Not odd enough to remember at first.”
Poirot leaned forward.
“Sir Claud had difficulty with carriage steps?”
“Yes.”
Julian glanced toward her.
“His knee.”
Poirot turned.
“What knee?”
“Right,” Eleanor said. “An old injury. He hated steep steps. The first one especially.”
“Always?”
“As far as I remember.”
Julian nodded.
“He complained about it constantly.”
Poirot asked:
“And his cane?”
Eleanor looked thoughtful.
“He carried it in his right hand when walking.”
“And when climbing?”
“He would usually shift it.”
“To the left?”
“Yes.”
“And the man you saw?”
She shut her eyes briefly as if trying to reconstruct the scene.
“I think he kept it in his right hand.”
“Think?”
“I cannot swear.”
Poirot nodded.
“Good. Do not swear to what you do not know.”
I said:
“A man with an injured knee might have a good day.”
Poirot turned to me.
“Certainly.”
“Or be hurrying.”
“Certainly.”
“Or Miss Vale may simply remember it wrongly.”
“Certainly.”
His agreement annoyed me more than argument would have.
Japp, however, had written it down.
Then Poirot asked another question which seemed to me almost perversely trivial.
“What did Sir Claud drink in the morning?”
Eleanor stared.
“I beg your pardon?”
“Coffee? Tea?”
“Coffee.”
Julian said:
“Always coffee.”
“Tea?”
“Not before luncheon,” Eleanor replied. “He disliked it in the morning.”
Poirot nodded.
I could contain myself no longer.
“What earthly difference does that make?”
He looked at me.
“Perhaps none.”
“Then why ask?”
“Because it is pleasant to know how the dead took their breakfast.”
Japp snorted.
Eleanor looked uncertain whether he was joking.
I suspected he was not.
Later that morning we returned to the railway offices to speak again with George Bell, the refreshment attendant.
I had regarded Bell as a minor witness.
Poirot did not.
He made the man repeat the order from the beginning.
Bell shifted his cap in his hands.
“Came through before departure, sir.”
“What time?”
“About quarter past nine. Maybe just before.”
“Who gave it?”
“One of the platform staff passed it along.”
“The exact order?”
“Tea for Sir Claud Mercer after departure.”
“That was all?”
Bell hesitated.
“No, sir.”
Poirot waited.
“He said—whoever gave the order—that if Sir Claud wasn’t in his seat, I was to leave it.”
I looked at him.
“Leave it?”
“Yes, sir.”
“In an empty compartment?”
“If he wasn’t there.”
“Why wasn’t this mentioned yesterday?”
Bell looked uncomfortable.
“Didn’t seem important.”
Poirot said:
“And what time did you deliver it?”
“About nine-forty-nine.”
“The train left at nine-forty.”
“Yes.”
“You opened the compartment.”
“Yes.”
“Was anyone inside?”
“No, sir.”
“You called?”
“Yes.”
“No answer?”
“No.”
“And you left the tea.”
“Yes.”
“Because you had been told to do so.”
“That’s right.”
Something shifted in my mind.
Not the whole mystery.
But something I had been certain of.
I saw again the white cup in the empty compartment.
I remembered touching it.
Warm.
The warmth had seemed to me almost a human pulse.
I said slowly:
“Then the tea proves nothing.”
Poirot looked at me.
“Nothing?”
“It proves it was delivered.”
“Exactly.”
“Not that Mercer drank it.”
“No.”
“Not that he was there when Bell brought it.”
“No.”
I felt genuinely disturbed.
For two days the warm tea had been the most convincing fact in the whole affair.
Now it had become merely tea.
Bell was dismissed.
I paced once along the corridor.
“That still leaves the station witnesses.”
“Yes.”
“And the ticket.”
“Yes.”
“And the possessions.”
“Yes.”
“And the fact that someone entered the compartment.”
“Ah,” Poirot said.
I stopped.
“What?”
“Nothing.”
“You always say ‘ah’ when you mean something.”
“A habit.”
“Then yours are just as irritating as Mercer’s.”
He smiled.
We went next to the section of railway where the express had slowed.
Japp had arranged for a railway inspector to show us the relevant points.
The setting suited my theory splendidly.
The tracks ran through a long shallow cutting before curving beneath the signals. There was a maintenance path along one side and, farther on, a low embankment with access toward a service road.
The inspector explained that the train had been checked by signals ahead and reduced speed for roughly three minutes.
“How slowly?” I asked.
He gave an estimate.
“Slow enough for a man to get down?”
He looked doubtful.
“A reckless man.”
“But possible.”
“Possible isn’t the same as sensible.”
“Murder seldom is.”
Poirot stood several yards away studying not the tracks but a signal post.
I walked along the edge.
Suppose a door opened here.
A man descended.
He reaches the path.
Someone waits beyond the fence.
The securities change hands.
By the time the train accelerates again, the passenger is gone.
I could see the whole thing.
Fenwick, with his military experience and strong nerves, could manage it.
Julian knew Mercer’s habits.
Perhaps the two were connected.
Perhaps not yet—but the shape was there.
Japp joined me.
“You’re thinking Fenwick?”
“I am.”
“He’s got the nerve for it.”
“And motive.”
“Threatening letters.”
“Presence at Victoria.”
Japp nodded.
“And that business with Julian?”
“They’re lying for reasons of their own.”
“So they say.”
I glanced toward Poirot.
“He is wasting his time looking at signals.”
Japp grinned.
“Bit rich coming from you.”
Poirot returned.
“Well?” I asked.
“Well what?”
“You’ve seen the place.”
“Yes.”
“A man could get off.”
“He could.”
I felt triumphant.
“There.”
“Where?”
“You admit it.”
“I admit that a man may jump from a moving train.”
“Then the three minutes matter.”
Poirot looked toward the tracks.
“Perhaps.”
We returned to Mercer & Vale late in the afternoon.
Rooke was still there.
He seemed somehow to have become the firm’s temporary nervous system. Telephones passed through him. Files appeared when requested. Names, appointments, railway details and bank records were supplied almost before anyone asked.
He looked tired but controlled.
When Poirot asked about Mercer’s breakfast habits, Rooke answered immediately.
“Coffee.”
“Never tea?”
“Rarely before lunch.”
“You arranged the refreshment order?”
Rooke paused.
“Not personally.”
“But you knew Sir Claud would travel?”
“Of course.”
“And you arranged the reservation.”
“Yes.”
“The ticket.”
“Yes.”
“The correspondence.”
“Yes.”
“The dispatch case papers.”
“Yes.”
Poirot looked at him for a moment.
Then smiled.
“You were indispensable.”
Rooke lowered his eyes.
“Sir Claud liked efficiency.”
“Did he appreciate yours?”
A curious expression crossed Rooke’s face.
“Sir Claud appreciated results.”
It was gone almost at once.
He excused himself to answer another telephone call.
I said:
“You suspect everyone who can organize a diary.”
Poirot looked at me.
“Do I?”
“You asked him more about coffee than murder.”
“Coffee can be very revealing.”
“How?”
“I did not say it was.”
I gave up.
By evening we had gathered again in Mercer’s private office: Japp, Poirot and myself.
The day’s evidence lay around us in notes and statements.
I had spent the carriage ride back from the railway cutting refining my theory.
Now I presented it.
“Fenwick knew Mercer was travelling.”
“Yes,” Japp said.
“He goes to Victoria intending to confront him.”
“Yes.”
“He sees him board.”
“So he says.”
“He has already threatened him.”
“Yes.”
“The securities are missing.”
“Yes.”
“The train later slows for three minutes at exactly the sort of place where a man might get down.”
Japp leaned back.
“Go on.”
I glanced at Poirot.
He was arranging three pencils beside the inkstand.
I ignored him.
“Suppose Fenwick had an accomplice.”
“Who?”
“I don’t know yet.”
“Julian?”
“Possibly.”
Japp considered.
“Julian knows Mercer’s arrangements.”
“He certainly knows enough about him.”
“And he lied about his morning.”
“He lied for Eleanor.”
“So they say.”
“Exactly.”
The theory was gathering weight even as I spoke.
“Suppose Fenwick obtains the securities, or knows someone aboard who does. The train slows. A man gets off. Someone waits below. The papers disappear. Mercer’s belongings remain behind to create confusion.”
Japp rubbed his chin.
“Not bad.”
Poirot moved one pencil a fraction of an inch.
I said:
“Not bad? It explains everything.”
Poirot looked up.
“Everything?”
“The disappearance.”
“Which disappearance?”
“Mercer’s.”
Poirot regarded me quietly.
I felt the old irritation rise.
“The man in the compartment.”
“Was there a man in the compartment after departure?”
I stopped.
“The tea—”
“Yes?”
I remembered Bell.
“The tea proves only that tea was delivered.”
“Good.”
“But someone was there.”
“When?”
“At Victoria.”
“Who?”
“Mercer.”
Poirot smiled.
“You are progressing backwards.”
I stood.
“Three witnesses identified him.”
“Did they?”
“Yes.”
“Fenwick spoke with him?”
“No.”
“Pym?”
“He dealt with him.”
“Briefly.”
“Yes.”
“Eleanor?”
“Saw him board.”
“From behind and to the side.”
I hesitated.
Poirot continued:
“And the manner in which he boarded?”
I frowned.
“The knee.”
“Ah.”
“That is hardly decisive.”
“No.”
“And the tea?”
“Ordered in advance.”
“Yes.”
“And what did Sir Claud usually drink?”
“Coffee.”
Poirot folded his hands.
Japp was watching him now.
I said:
“You cannot build a murder case out of breakfast habits.”
“No, Hastings.”
“Then what?”
Poirot looked at me with something almost like sympathy.
I pointed toward my notes.
“The signals are still the only physical opportunity. Three minutes. If someone left the train, it happened there.”
Poirot shook his head.
“No.”
I stared.
“No?”
“Those three minutes do not matter at all.”
Japp leaned forward.
“Steady on, Poirot. That’s a bit strong.”
“They do not matter.”
I felt genuinely exasperated.
“But if he did not leave the train there, when did he escape?”
Poirot looked at me.
“He did not.”
Japp frowned.
“What do you mean?”
Poirot rose.
The room seemed suddenly very quiet.
Outside, the City was settling into evening. A telephone rang in some distant office and was answered.
Poirot looked from Japp to me.
Then he said:
“No one escaped from the train.”
THE NEW CASES OF HERCULE POIROT
From the Recollections of Captain Arthur Hastings
THE AFFAIR OF THE EMPTY COMPARTMENT
PART FOUR
THE MAN EVERYONE SAW
“No one escaped from the train.”
For several seconds after Poirot spoke, neither Japp nor I said anything.
It was not that the words were difficult to understand. They were perfectly simple. Indeed, that was what made them irritating.
Japp was the first to recover.
“Come off it, Poirot.”
Poirot regarded him mildly.
“My dear Japp?”
“You know perfectly well what I mean. We’ve spent two days trying to discover how a man vanished from that carriage.”
“No.”
Japp stared.
“No?”
“We have spent two days assuming that a man vanished from that carriage.”
I felt my patience give way.
“That is splitting hairs.”
“Hair-splitting,” said Poirot, “is frequently condemned by those who have tied the wrong hairs together.”
“You cannot deny the compartment was empty.”
“I do not.”
“Or that someone was seen going into it.”
“I do not.”
“Or that Mercer’s things were found there.”
“Certainly not.”
“Then what exactly do you deny?”
Poirot picked up his hat.
“Only the word ‘therefore.’”
Japp gave me a look.
I knew the look.
It was the expression of an Englishman confronted with a foreigner who had plainly decided to become philosophical before dinner.
“Very useful,” I said.
Poirot smiled.
“Tomorrow, Hastings, we shall do something extremely unfashionable.”
“What?”
“We shall ask people what happened.”
“That is what we have been doing.”
“No. We have asked them what they concluded.”
He moved toward the door.
“There is a difference.”
I confess that I went to bed that night more annoyed than enlightened.
The difference, as Poirot had put it, appeared to me largely verbal.
Three people had seen Sir Claud Mercer at Victoria.
A porter had handled his luggage and spoken with him. Major Fenwick had recognized him from across the platform. Eleanor Vale had seen him climb into his carriage.
His ticket had passed the barrier.
His possessions had been found inside the reserved compartment.
If that did not constitute evidence of a man’s presence, I could not imagine what would.
Nevertheless, one point troubled me.
The warm tea, which had at first seemed so conclusive, had vanished as evidence almost entirely. Bell had delivered it to an already empty compartment because he had been instructed to leave it there.
And there was that curious business of Mercer’s knee.
And the coffee.
Small things.
Insignificant things, surely.
But Poirot had a disconcerting habit of treating small things as though they were not obliged to remain small.
By nine o’clock the following morning we were once more at Victoria.
The station was as busy as on the day the affair began.
A train had just arrived from the coast. Porters pushed luggage carts along the platform. Steam drifted beneath the roof. Doors slammed, whistles sounded, and everywhere people moved with that purposeful confusion which belongs particularly to great railway termini.
Albert Pym stood before us in his porter’s uniform.
He appeared faintly offended by being questioned again.
“I’ve told you, sir. It was Sir Claud.”
Poirot nodded.
“Yes.”
Pym blinked.
“Yes?”
“You saw the man whom you believed to be Sir Claud.”
“It was Sir Claud.”
“Very good. Let us begin there.”
I saw Pym’s expression and sympathized with him.
Poirot continued.
“What first made you notice him?”
“The gentleman came toward me.”
“From where?”
“Main concourse.”
“How far away when you first recognized him?”
Pym considered.
“Twenty yards. Something like that.”
“At twenty yards you saw his face?”
“Not proper, no.”
“What did you see?”
Pym frowned.
“Sir Claud.”
Poirot waited.
The porter tried again.
“The coat.”
“What coat?”
“His travelling coat. Dark one. I’d seen it before.”
“And?”
“The stick.”
“The silver-headed cane?”
“Yes.”
“What else?”
“The case.”
“The dispatch case?”
“Yes, sir.”
“And at that point you knew who he was?”
“Course I did.”
Poirot nodded.
“You expected him?”
“I knew his reservation.”
“How?”
“Station list. He travelled the route often enough.”
“So you knew Sir Claud Mercer was expected to take the Channel express.”
“Yes.”
“And then you saw a man of Sir Claud’s build wearing Sir Claud’s coat, carrying Sir Claud’s cane and Sir Claud’s dispatch case.”
Pym gave him a suspicious look.
“If you put it like that.”
“How else should I put it?”
“Well—it was him.”
“Then we come closer. You spoke?”
“Yes.”
“What did you say?”
“‘Morning, Sir Claud.’”
“And what did he say?”
Pym hesitated.
“Asked whether the train was on time.”
“Anything else?”
“Told me to see to his bag. Said something about tea.”
“Did he call you by name?”
“No.”
“Had Sir Claud done so on previous journeys?”
Pym thought.
“Once or twice.”
“What was his voice like that morning?”
The porter looked increasingly uncomfortable.
“Normal.”
“Describe it.”
“I can’t describe a voice.”
“Deep?”
“Fairly.”
“Loud?”
“No.”
“Did he speak more than a few words at a time?”
“No.”
Poirot stepped a little nearer.
“Did he look directly at you?”
“Not much. Busy station, wasn’t it?”
“Did you see his entire face?”
“I saw enough.”
“What is enough?”
Pym’s irritation finally overcame him.
“Look here, sir, I don’t go about measuring gentlemen’s noses. I knew his clothes, his stick, his luggage, where he was going, and he answered when I called him Sir Claud. What was I meant to think?”
Poirot smiled.
“Exactly.”
The irritation left Pym’s face.
“I beg your pardon?”
“You were meant to think precisely what you thought.”
Pym glanced at me.
I could see that he found this even less satisfactory than I did.
Poirot thanked him warmly.
As we walked away, I said:
“You haven’t proved he was wrong.”
“I have not attempted to.”
“He still says it was Mercer.”
“Yes.”
“You believe him mistaken.”
Poirot stopped beside a pillar.
“My dear Hastings, suppose you meet me tomorrow morning in Piccadilly.”
“I frequently do.”
“You see my coat.”
“Yes.”
“My hat.”
“Yes.”
“My figure.”
“Yes.”
“You know that I have arranged to meet you. A man approaches at the appointed hour wearing my clothes and carrying my walking stick. You call, ‘Poirot!’ He turns slightly and answers you. Would you recognize him?”
“Certainly.”
Poirot’s eyebrows rose.
“I should recognize you.”
“That is not the same answer.”
“It is perfectly well the same answer.”
He resumed walking.
I followed.
“No,” he said. “It is the same conclusion.”
Major Fenwick proved even less patient than Pym.
He met us in a small waiting room adjoining the station offices.
“I have already admitted everything relevant.”
Poirot sat opposite him.
“You admitted why you came to Victoria.”
“Yes.”
“You intended to confront Sir Claud.”
“Yes.”
“You saw him.”
“Yes.”
“Where?”
“I told you. Across the platform.”
“Show me.”
Fenwick frowned.
Poirot stood.
“Imagine that I am the man.”
“You’re considerably shorter.”
Poirot glanced at me.
“Hastings, the Major has discovered my first deficiency.”
Fenwick almost smiled.
Poirot crossed to the far side of the room.
“The distance?”
“Greater than that.”
Poirot moved farther.
“There.”
“And what was between you?”
“Passengers. Porters. Steam. The usual station clutter.”
“Did you see his face?”
“Partly.”
“Clearly?”
“No.”
“Did he see you?”
“No.”
“Did he speak?”
“No.”
“What made you certain?”
Fenwick’s face hardened.
“I had spent years hating the man.”
The answer silenced us for a moment.
Poirot said gently:
“So you were looking for him.”
“Yes.”
“You knew he would be here.”
“Yes.”
“And you saw the coat?”
“Yes.”
“The cane?”
“Yes.”
“His figure?”
“Yes.”
“His face?”
“Not clearly.”
“His voice?”
“No.”
Poirot nodded.
Fenwick leaned forward.
“Do not misunderstand me. I am not withdrawing my statement.”
“I have not asked you to.”
“I still believe the man was Mercer.”
“I understand.”
“You think I was deceived.”
Poirot smiled.
“I think you saw exactly what you say you saw.”
Fenwick frowned.
“That sounds like lawyer’s language.”
“It is detective’s language.”
Outside the room I said:
“You are turning witnesses into optical instruments.”
“On the contrary. I am allowing them to be human.”
Eleanor Vale was our final station witness.
She met us at Mercer & Vale.
Her manner had changed somewhat since the revelation of her engagement to Julian. The burden of concealment had lifted, though the consequences of Sir Claud’s death had not.
Poirot began without preamble.
“You saw Sir Claud enter his carriage.”
“I saw the man I believed to be Sir Claud.”
I glanced at Poirot.
He noticed.
“Ah,” he said.
Eleanor gave us a tired smile.
“After being questioned by you three times, one learns caution.”
“Caution is excellent when it does not become invention.”
“I am not inventing.”
“Good. Tell us exactly.”
She closed her eyes briefly.
“He was perhaps fifteen yards ahead of me. Maybe less. He wore the dark coat. I remember the silver cane.”
“The dispatch case?”
“Yes.”
“The hat?”
“Yes.”
“His face?”
“Not properly. He was turned away.”
“Did you call to him?”
“No.”
“Why?”
“I was in a hurry.”
“And perhaps,” Poirot said, “you had your own reasons not to attract attention at the station.”
A slight colour entered her cheeks.
“Yes.”
Julian.
Poirot continued.
“You saw the man mount the carriage.”
“Yes.”
“And he mounted easily.”
Eleanor nodded.
“That is what troubles me now.”
“Because of the knee?”
“Yes.”
I said:
“You could hardly diagnose a man from one step.”
She looked at me.
“No. But I knew Sir Claud. He made a ritual of complaining about that knee. If the first carriage step was high, he paused before it.”
“And transferred the cane?” Poirot asked.
“Yes.”
“The man you saw?”
“He did not.”
“You are certain?”
“No.”
Poirot smiled approvingly.
“A very good answer.”
Eleanor continued.
“But I am reasonably sure. It was all so quick.”
“And nevertheless you thought immediately, ‘There is Sir Claud Mercer.’”
“Yes.”
“Why?”
She looked almost embarrassed.
“Because who else could it be?”
Poirot said nothing.
The question hung in the room.
Who else could it be?
It was, I began to realize, the question upon which the entire mystery had been built.
We had lunch late.
Over coffee—not tea, a fact Poirot pointedly declined to comment upon—I tried to arrange my thoughts.
“So no witness is absolute.”
“No witness is ever absolute,” said Poirot.
“But all three independently recognized Mercer.”
“Did they?”
“There you go again.”
“I ask only for precision.”
“Pym recognized the coat and cane.”
“Yes.”
“Fenwick recognized the coat, cane and figure.”
“Yes.”
“Eleanor knew the same things and saw him enter the carriage.”
“Yes.”
“So all three recognized the same man.”
Poirot shook his head.
“All three recognized the same signs.”
I stared at him.
He picked up the sugar tongs.
“A coat.”
He placed a lump of sugar beside his cup.
“A cane.”
Another.
“A dispatch case.”
Another.
“A ticket.”
Another.
“A destination.”
Another.
“A gentleman expected at a particular place at a particular hour.”
He placed down the tongs.
I looked at the little row of sugar lumps.
“That is very pretty.”
“It is also very dangerous.”
“You mean someone deliberately created the appearance of Mercer?”
Poirot’s face became expressionless.
“I mean only that we have proved the appearance of Mercer.”
“Not Mercer himself.”
“Precisely.”
I leaned back.
For the first time I felt the case alter beneath me.
Not solve.
Alter.
The distinction was almost physical.
Until then Sir Claud Mercer had been a man who vanished.
Now, perhaps, the thing which vanished had never been Sir Claud Mercer at all.
But if so—
“Who was it?”
Poirot drank his coffee.
“That is a much better question.”
Our return to Mercer & Vale brought another development.
Miss Beatrice Cole was waiting in the boardroom with Japp.
On the table before her lay a small notebook.
She appeared more uncomfortable than I had yet seen her.
Japp said:
“Miss Cole’s decided to tell us what she meant by ‘nothing relevant.’”
Miss Cole did not flinch.
“I was wrong.”
“About relevance?” Poirot asked.
“About remaining silent.”
She opened the notebook.
Inside were rows of figures and account references in a neat hand.
“I began copying these three weeks ago.”
Japp said:
“Why?”
“Because the figures were wrong.”
“In what way?”
“They were not wrong individually. That was the difficulty.”
She turned several pages.
“Each transaction could be explained. A transfer between investment accounts. A fee. A temporary holding. A correction. But when I compared certain accounts over several months, the same amounts appeared to move in patterns.”
“Money disappearing?” I asked.
“Not directly.”
I confess my expression must have revealed something, for she added:
“You do not steal from a firm like Mercer & Vale by writing ‘stolen’ beside a large withdrawal, Captain Hastings.”
Japp grinned.
“Pity. Saves paperwork.”
Miss Cole ignored him.
“The money passed through several investment accounts. Small enough movements not to attract immediate notice. Large enough in total to matter.”
“How much?” Poirot asked.
She gave the approximate sum.
Even after Armand’s securities, it impressed me.
“Who controlled these accounts?” Japp asked.
“Several departments touched them.”
“That isn’t an answer.”
“No.”
Miss Cole hesitated.
“Mr Rooke had administrative authority across all of them.”
The room became very still.
“Rooke?” I said.
“Yes.”
I thought at once of the quiet secretary, efficient even under the weight of his employer’s murder.
“Are you accusing him?”
“No.”
Miss Cole’s answer was immediate.
“That is why I said nothing. Mr Rooke has served Sir Claud for twelve years. Half the firm depends upon him. He could explain almost any individual entry.”
“But the pattern?” Poirot asked.
“I could not explain the pattern.”
“Did Sir Claud know?”
“I believe so.”
“Why?”
“The morning he died he asked for the ledgers containing these references.”
Poirot glanced at Japp.
“When?”
“The previous afternoon. They were sent to his office before he arrived.”
“And he came unusually early.”
“Yes.”
“Did Rooke know the ledgers were there?”
Miss Cole hesitated.
“He would ordinarily know everything placed before Sir Claud.”
That phrase remained in my mind.
Everything.
Poirot asked quietly:
“Who arranged Sir Claud’s appointments?”
“Mr Rooke.”
“His correspondence?”
“Mr Rooke.”
“Railway reservations?”
“Yes.”
“Tickets?”
“Yes.”
“Continental arrangements?”
“Yes.”
“The Armand transaction?”
“He handled the correspondence.”
“Dispatch-case papers?”
“Yes.”
“His diary?”
“Yes.”
“His office schedule?”
“Yes.”
Miss Cole looked increasingly uneasy.
“That was his position.”
“Of course.”
Poirot’s tone was perfectly neutral.
Yet suddenly the ordinary fact of Rooke’s usefulness seemed less ordinary.
Japp closed the notebook.
“I want these ledgers.”
Miss Cole nodded.
“And I want Rooke’s authority records, bank instructions, correspondence copies—everything.”
“Inspector—”
“Everything.”
She left.
I said:
“You think Rooke has been stealing from the firm.”
Japp said:
“I think Miss Cole thinks somebody has.”
“Rooke was at the bank at ten-fifteen.”
Poirot looked at me.
“Yes.”
“He could hardly have been involved in anything aboard the train.”
Poirot glanced at Japp.
“What does ten-fifteen prove?”
“That he was at the bank.”
“At ten-fifteen.”
“Yes.”
“Where was he at nine-fifteen?”
I paused.
“He says he was coming from the office.”
“At nine-twenty-five?”
“I don’t know.”
“Nine-thirty?”
I began to see his point.
Japp did too.
Poirot said:
“Find the ordinary journey time from Victoria to the City.”
Japp nodded.
“Cab?”
“Cab. Motor taxi. Whatever was readily available that morning.”
“You think the timing works?”
“I think we should not decide before measuring it.”
There was another visitor whom Poirot wished to see.
Mrs Agnes Webb, Sir Claud’s housekeeper, was a substantial woman with the air of one who had survived thirty years of domestic emergencies and therefore did not consider murder sufficient reason for imprecision.
Poirot asked about Sir Claud’s clothing on the morning of his death.
“He wore the grey town coat.”
“Not the dark travelling coat?”
“No.”
I looked at her.
“The coat found on the train?”
“That one was kept at the office.”
“Why?”
“Sir Claud often went directly from business to Victoria. He disliked carrying things back and forth.”
“The hat?”
“Some travelling things were kept with the coat.”
“And the silver-headed cane?”
“He had several sticks. That one was generally used for journeys. It was sometimes at the office.”
Poirot nodded.
“So the things by which people most readily recognized Sir Claud at Victoria were not necessarily at his home that morning.”
“No.”
“They were available at Mercer & Vale.”
“Yes.”
Mrs Webb seemed surprised that this should matter.
So, for a moment, was I.
Then I remembered the witnesses.
The coat.
The cane.
The case.
The expectation.
I said nothing.
After she had gone, Poirot asked for the railway photographs of the compartment.
Japp spread them over the long boardroom table.
There was the coat across the seat.
The hat.
The gloves.
The cane.
The dispatch case.
The newspaper.
The tea tray.
I had seen the scene so many times in memory that the photograph seemed almost intimate.
Poirot pointed to the newspaper.
“Opened?”
“No,” Japp said. “Still folded.”
“Who bought it?”
“Not established.”
I said:
“Does that matter?”
Poirot ignored me.
Miss Cole had returned with the first bundle of ledgers. Eleanor was also present, having come to collect papers belonging to her father.
Poirot turned to her.
“When Sir Claud travelled, what did he do with his newspaper?”
Eleanor looked puzzled.
“Read it.”
“Yes. But when?”
“Immediately.”
“Which part?”
“The financial pages.”
“You are certain?”
She smiled faintly.
“Sir Claud could ignore a companion for twenty minutes if there were market prices in front of him.”
Poirot tapped the photograph.
“The newspaper was still folded.”
I said:
“Perhaps he intended to read it later.”
“Yes.”
“He may have been interrupted.”
“Yes.”
“You agree with everything.”
“When everything is possible.”
Eleanor looked again at the photographs.
“And the hat.”
Poirot turned.
“What of it?”
“He would never put it there.”
“Where would he put it?”
“Rack.”
“The gloves?”
“Rack or pocket.”
“Not on the seat?”
“He disliked outdoor things on upholstery.”
I felt an odd sensation.
Coffee.
Knee.
Cane.
Hat.
Gloves.
Newspaper.
Every object in that compartment cried out Sir Claud Mercer.
And yet every habit seemed somehow wrong.
It was as though someone had furnished a room from a catalogue without ever having lived in it.
I said slowly:
“It doesn’t look like him.”
Poirot turned his head.
“What does not?”
“The compartment.”
Japp gave me a curious look.
I continued.
“All his things are there.”
“Yes.”
“But not the things he would have done with them.”
Poirot said nothing.
That silence was more encouraging than praise.
Unfortunately my moment of insight was interrupted by the arrival of Julian Mercer.
And with Julian came a revelation which sent my thoughts in quite another direction.
Japp held a document between two fingers.
“Recognize this?”
Julian did.
The colour left his face.
“Where did you get that?”
“Your uncle’s solicitor.”
Eleanor, who had been standing near the window, turned.
“What is it?”
Julian said nothing.
Japp answered for him.
“A promissory note.”
He placed it on the table.
“Private loan. Sir Claud’s signature at the bottom.”
Eleanor looked at Julian.
“That’s impossible.”
Julian stared at the paper.
Japp said:
“Why?”
Eleanor’s eyes did not leave Julian.
“Because Sir Claud refused him.”
There was a silence.
Then Julian said:
“I signed it.”
Japp folded his arms.
“You mean Sir Claud signed it?”
“No.”
The word was barely audible.
“I signed his name.”
Eleanor stepped back as though struck.
“Julian.”
“I was going to repay it.”
“That is generally the ambition of a forger,” said Japp.
Julian turned angrily.
“I did not kill him.”
“But you forged his signature.”
“Yes.”
“And he discovered it?”
Julian hesitated.
“I think he had begun to suspect.”
“You quarrelled Saturday night.”
“Yes.”
“About this?”
“Partly.”
“Yet you told us it was merely money.”
“It was money.”
“That’s a politician’s answer.”
Julian looked toward Eleanor.
She turned away.
I felt sorry for him, but I could not ignore the facts.
Debt.
Forgery.
Inheritance.
A quarrel.
A secret engagement opposed by Mercer.
And a lie about his movements.
Then there was Fenwick.
Threatening letters.
Hatred.
Presence at Victoria.
The railway slowdown.
The securities.
I confess that the theory arrived almost complete.
It seemed absurd that I had not seen it before.
Later, when Eleanor and Julian had gone and Miss Cole was occupied elsewhere, I laid it before Japp and Poirot.
“Fenwick and Julian.”
Japp raised an eyebrow.
“Together?”
“Yes.”
Poirot sat quietly.
I began.
“Julian needed money desperately. Mercer was threatening to cut him off and may have discovered the forgery.”
“Agreed,” Japp said.
“Julian knew Mercer’s habits and travel arrangements.”
“Likely.”
“He knew about the Continental journey.”
“Yes.”
“Fenwick hated Mercer and had already threatened him.”
“Yes.”
“He went to Victoria specifically to confront him.”
“Yes.”
“Now suppose Julian and Fenwick had reached some arrangement.”
“What arrangement?” Japp asked.
“I don’t know precisely.”
Poirot stirred.
I ignored him.
“Perhaps Fenwick intended only to force Mercer to surrender the securities. Perhaps matters went wrong.”
“Hastings,” Poirot said mildly, “Sir Claud was already dead.”
“Yes, but we don’t yet know exactly how the station business connects to the murder.”
“Proceed.”
I did.
“Julian provides the information. Fenwick appears at Victoria. Someone gets the securities aboard. The compartment is used to make it look as though Mercer travelled with them.”
“Who’s the man in Mercer’s clothes?” Japp asked.
“That could be another accomplice.”
Poirot’s eyebrows rose.
“Already we have three.”
“Not necessarily. Fenwick himself might have worn the coat.”
Japp shook his head.
“Pym would notice. Fenwick’s broader.”
“Then Julian.”
“Eleanor knows Julian.”
“From behind, in a coat and hat—”
I stopped.
Poirot said nothing.
“The details can be settled later,” I continued. “The important part is the structure.”
“Ah,” said Poirot.
“The train departs. The securities are removed. Someone gets off during the slowdown.”
“Who?”
“Fenwick, perhaps.”
“After being seen on the platform as himself?”
“An accomplice, then.”
“Four?”
I glared at Poirot.
“You are deliberately making this difficult.”
“No, Hastings. You are making it populous.”
Japp laughed.
I pressed on.
“The point is that the signal slowdown explains the escape.”
Poirot’s smile vanished.
“No.”
“There were three minutes.”
“There were also three witnesses.”
“What has that to do with it?”
“Everything.”
I stood before the table of photographs.
“I can make nearly every fact fit.”
“That,” said Poirot, “is what concerns me.”
Japp looked at him.
“Why?”
“Because facts should fit a theory without being forced into it. Hastings requires Fenwick, Julian, perhaps another accomplice, perhaps a disguise, perhaps an exchange of securities, perhaps an escape from a moving train—”
“Because it was a complicated crime.”
“Or because it is a simple crime being explained from the wrong beginning.”
That irritated me.
“What wrong beginning?”
Poirot rose.
“Let us examine your solution.”
He began almost pleasantly.
“Did anyone see Major Fenwick enter Sir Claud’s compartment?”
“No.”
“Did anyone see Julian Mercer aboard the train?”
“No.”
“Did anyone see either man possess the securities?”
“No.”
“Did anyone see a passenger leave Sir Claud’s compartment after departure?”
“No.”
“Did anyone see Sir Claud alive after Victoria?”
“No.”
“The tea proved that he occupied the compartment?”
“No.”
“The ticket proved that he remained aboard after departure?”
“No.”
“The signal slowdown proved someone left?”
“No, but—”
Poirot raised a finger.
“Then what have you done?”
“I have made deductions.”
“You have supplied mechanisms.”
“Deductions require mechanisms.”
“Sometimes. But you have built an ingenious escape from the train because you began by assuming that someone had to escape from it.”
I felt the remark more keenly than I cared to admit.
Japp was silent.
Poirot turned toward the photographs.
“The porter says, ‘I saw Sir Claud Mercer.’”
“Yes.”
“Major Fenwick says the same.”
“Yes.”
“Miss Vale says the same.”
“Yes.”
“But what did they see?”
I looked at the photographs.
“The coat.”
“Yes.”
“The cane.”
“Yes.”
“The case.”
“Yes.”
“The figure.”
“Yes.”
“The journey they expected him to make.”
“Yes.”
“The ticket.”
“Yes.”
Poirot nodded.
“A collection of signs.”
I understood now what he had been doing from the beginning.
Not attacking honest witnesses.
Separating the thing seen from the name attached to it.
He picked up one of the photographs.
“You see, Hastings, recognition is very curious. We imagine that we recognize a man. Often we recognize the circumstances in which the man ought to appear.”
Japp said:
“So somebody dressed up as Mercer.”
Poirot placed down the photograph.
“I have not said so.”
“You might as well have.”
“No. The difference matters.”
I paced to the window.
“If the man at Victoria was not Sir Claud, then what became of him?”
Poirot looked pleased.
“That, Hastings, is at last the correct question.”
“And who was he?”
“That is another.”
I turned.
“Rooke?”
For the first time his name entered the room as more than background.
Japp watched Poirot closely.
Poirot did not answer.
I pressed on.
“Rooke had access to everything.”
“Yes.”
“The coat was here.”
“Yes.”
“The cane.”
“Apparently.”
“The ticket.”
“Yes.”
“The reservation.”
“Yes.”
“The dispatch case.”
“Yes.”
“He knew the journey.”
“Yes.”
“And Miss Cole’s ledgers suggest he may have been stealing.”
“They suggest irregularities requiring investigation.”
“You’re very cautious suddenly.”
“I am always cautious when Hastings begins to gallop.”
Japp said:
“The ten-fifteen bank appearance still bothers me.”
Poirot nodded.
“As it should.”
“If Rooke were at Victoria close to departure, he’d have to get back to the City.”
“Yes.”
“How fast?”
“That is why you will discover the journey time.”
Japp grunted.
“So you’re not ready to arrest him.”
“No.”
“Not even close?”
“Closer is not the same as close enough.”
That afternoon I returned alone for several minutes to the photographs of the compartment.
I studied them as though they belonged to an entirely different case.
The first time I had seen that room I had thought it deserted.
The second time, abandoned.
Now I thought something else.
Arranged.
The coat lay where it could be seen.
The cane stood where it could be recognized.
The dispatch case displayed its initials.
The newspaper announced a traveller but had never been opened.
The hat and gloves sat where Mercer himself would not have placed them.
And the tea—
The tea had arrived after the compartment was already empty.
It was extraordinary.
There seemed almost too much Mercer in that compartment.
His possessions spoke so loudly that for two days none of us had noticed the silence of the man himself.
When Poirot returned I said as much.
He looked at me with approval.
“Very good, Hastings.”
“Then I am right?”
“That is a dangerous question.”
“You know what I mean.”
“Yes.”
He stood beside me.
I pointed to the photograph.
“Suppose it was an impersonation. Someone enters the carriage dressed as Mercer.”
“Yes.”
“Leaves the possessions.”
“Yes.”
“Then disappears.”
Poirot said nothing.
I continued.
“But that still leaves the original impossibility.”
“What impossibility?”
“The passenger.”
“Which passenger?”
“The man Eleanor saw enter the compartment.”
“Yes?”
“Whether he was Mercer or someone else, he entered the train.”
“Yes.”
“Then Pike finds the compartment empty.”
“Yes.”
“The guard’s observation is sound.”
“Yes.”
“The train did not stop.”
“Yes.”
“So the man still disappeared.”
Poirot turned toward me.
For a moment I felt triumphant.
I had found the flaw.
“You see?”
“Yes, Hastings.”
“Then we are back where we started.”
“No.”
“Why not?”
“Because you have forgotten the clock.”
“The clock?”
He drew out his watch.
“At what time did Miss Vale see the man enter the carriage?”
“About nine-seventeen.”
“And when did the train depart?”
“Nine-forty.”
I stared at him.
He said nothing.
Twenty-three minutes.
I felt something inside my mind shift.
“But…”
Poirot waited.
“The train was still at Victoria.”
“Yes.”
“For more than twenty minutes.”
“Yes.”
I saw it.
Not completely.
But enough.
The man had not needed signals.
Or an embankment.
Or a daring jump.
He had not needed another railway line.
He had not even needed a moving train.
I said slowly:
“The passenger did disappear.”
Poirot’s eyes gleamed.
“Yes.”
“But not after departure.”
“No.”
Japp, who had entered behind us unheard, stopped in the doorway.
“What are you two on about?”
I turned to Poirot.
“Where?”
He answered very quietly.
“At Victoria.”
Japp frowned.
Poirot looked once more at the photograph of the empty compartment.
“The man who entered Sir Claud Mercer’s compartment left the train before the train itself left Victoria.”
THE NEW CASES OF HERCULE POIROT
From the Recollections of Captain Arthur Hastings
THE AFFAIR OF THE EMPTY COMPARTMENT
PART FIVE
THE LITTLE ARRANGEMENT
There are moments in an investigation when one suddenly discovers that the mystery has not been difficult because the facts were complicated, but because one has been looking at them from the wrong side.
I experienced such a moment in the boardroom of Mercer & Vale.
“The man who entered Sir Claud Mercer’s compartment,” Poirot had said, “left the train before the train itself left Victoria.”
It was absurdly simple.
For days I had imagined doors opened upon rushing railway cuttings, desperate leaps beneath signals, accomplices concealed in adjoining carriages and packets of securities passed from hand to hand.
And all the while the train had been standing still.
Twenty-three minutes.
The man Eleanor Vale had seen enter the compartment at approximately nine-seventeen had nearly twenty-three minutes before the express departed.
He had needed no courage.
No acrobatics.
No railway knowledge.
He had needed only to open the carriage door and step back onto the platform.
Japp was staring at Poirot.
“Then the compartment was empty when the train left?”
Poirot spread his hands.
“That is what we must prove.”
“You just said—”
“I said what I believe.”
“That usually means you’ve proved it to yourself.”
“Ah, but Japp, the police are not permitted the luxury of my personal satisfaction.”
Japp grunted.
“And what do you want?”
Poirot looked around Sir Claud’s boardroom.
“A table.”
“You’ve got one.”
“A long table.”
“You’ve still got one.”
“The things from the compartment.”
Japp’s eyes narrowed.
“All of them?”
“All.”
I knew that expression.
Whenever Poirot began asking for ordinary objects to be put into precise positions, one could be certain that the ordinary objects were about to become extremely disagreeable to somebody.
By three o’clock the boardroom had been transformed.
The long polished table had been cleared.
At one end lay Sir Claud Mercer’s dark travelling coat.
Beside it were the soft felt hat and gloves.
The silver-headed cane rested against the table edge.
The leather dispatch case stood with the initials C.M. facing outward.
The newspaper had been folded precisely as it had been when I first saw it aboard the train.
Japp had even obtained a railway cup and saucer, although the tea within it was newly made and far too hot.
The clipped ticket lay beside the cup.
Miss Beatrice Cole stood near the window.
Japp remained at the far end of the table with a folder of documents beneath his arm.
Martin Rooke had been asked to join us.
He stood quietly beside one of the chairs.
There was no visible agitation in him.
Indeed, if one had entered the room without knowledge of the case, one might have taken him for the man responsible for arranging the meeting rather than the man around whom suspicion was beginning to gather.
Poirot looked at me.
“Hastings.”
“Yes?”
“Describe what you saw.”
I looked at the table.
“The compartment?”
“As you first found it.”
I hesitated.
The objects had become so familiar that I scarcely needed the photographs.
“The coat lay across the corner of the seat.”
Poirot placed a hand upon it.
“The hat?”
“Beside it.”
“The gloves?”
“With the hat.”
“The cane?”
“Propped against the upholstery where it could be seen.”
“The dispatch case?”
“On the opposite seat.”
“The initials?”
“Facing outward.”
“The newspaper?”
“Neatly folded.”
“The rack?”
“Empty.”
“And the tea?”
“Beside the window.”
Poirot nodded.
Then he asked:
“Where is Sir Claud Mercer?”
I frowned.
“In the compartment?”
“In this picture.”
“He isn’t.”
Poirot looked at me.
“He is everywhere.”
I stared.
Poirot touched the coat.
“Sir Claud.”
The cane.
“Sir Claud.”
The case.
“Sir Claud.”
The ticket.
“Sir Claud.”
The newspaper.
“Sir Claud.”
Finally the cup.
“And this—most loudly of all—Sir Claud.”
I smiled faintly.
“You make him sound like a department store.”
“A very good department store, Hastings, does precisely what this compartment did.”
“What?”
“It tells you what to think before you ask a question.”
Japp folded his arms.
“Go on.”
Poirot turned toward him.
“When Captain Hastings first entered that compartment, he did not see evidence from which he slowly concluded that Sir Claud Mercer had been present.”
“I did.”
“No.”
I objected.
“I certainly did.”
“You saw Sir Claud’s coat, his cane, his dispatch case, his newspaper, his ticket and the tea ordered in his name. The conclusion arrived before the reasoning.”
“That is generally how recognition works.”
“Exactly.”
Poirot’s eyes brightened.
“That is the heart of it.”
He moved along the table.
“These things are not the remains of a journey.”
He indicated the carefully ordered row.
“They are an announcement.”
Miss Cole looked at the coat.
“You mean someone deliberately placed them?”
“Yes.”
Rooke spoke for the first time.
“Surely that is speculative.”
His voice remained quiet.
Poirot turned courteously.
“Entirely, Mr Rooke. For the moment.”
Rooke inclined his head.
I watched him.
Nothing in his face betrayed alarm.
Poirot continued.
“Consider the hat and gloves.”
He looked at Eleanor, who had joined us a few minutes earlier.
“Sir Claud placed them where?”
“On the rack.”
“Usually?”
“Almost always.”
“And his coat?”
“If he removed it, also above if there was room.”
“He disliked outdoor things upon the seat.”
“Yes.”
Poirot indicated the newspaper.
“And this?”
Eleanor smiled sadly.
“He would have opened it immediately.”
“To what?”
“The financial pages.”
“And yet it was never opened.”
“No.”
“The tea?”
“Sir Claud took coffee in the mornings.”
Poirot nodded.
“The carriage step?”
Eleanor’s expression changed.
“He climbed it too easily.”
“Because?”
“His right knee.”
“And his cane?”
“He normally shifted it before climbing.”
Poirot turned to me.
“You see, Hastings?”
I did.
Or thought I did.
“The person at Victoria knew what Mercer looked like.”
“Yes.”
“But not how Mercer behaved.”
Poirot made a small gesture.
“Almost.”
“Almost?”
“The distinction is more delicate. Whoever arranged this knew a great deal about Sir Claud. Enough to reproduce the public signs of him. Not necessarily enough, in a moment of pressure, to reproduce every unconscious habit.”
He glanced toward Rooke.
Only for an instant.
Rooke’s face did not change.
Poirot took up the cane.
“A man who must persuade another man for twenty seconds does not require a perfect disguise.”
He set it down.
“He requires the victim’s expectation.”
“Victim?” I said.
“The victim of the deception, Hastings. Not of the murder.”
Japp smiled.
“For once, Captain, you’re not dead.”
“I am reassured.”
Poirot continued.
“Albert Pym knew Sir Claud was travelling. He saw the expected coat, expected cane, expected case, expected destination.”
“He spoke to him,” I said.
“A few words.”
“Fenwick knew Mercer.”
“He saw him from across a platform.”
“Eleanor knew him even better.”
“And saw mostly a coat and cane as the figure entered the carriage.”
Eleanor said quietly:
“I supplied the face myself.”
Poirot looked at her.
“Yes, mademoiselle.”
That sentence troubled me.
It seemed almost eerie.
Three people had seen a man.
And all three, in a sense, had completed him in their own minds.
Japp walked to the table.
“All right. Suppose someone puts on Mercer’s coat and hat and takes the stick and case. He goes to Victoria. Gets himself seen. Climbs aboard.”
“Yes.”
“Then what?”
Poirot glanced at the clock.
“Let us have the times.”
Japp opened his notebook.
“Pym sees him shortly after nine.”
“Nine-two,” I said.
“Near enough.”
“Ticket clipped at nine-six.”
“Fenwick, nine-ten.”
“Tea ordered at nine-thirteen.”
“Eleanor sees the figure board around nine-seventeen.”
Poirot nodded.
“And departure?”
“Nine-forty.”
“Therefore?”
I answered before Japp.
“Twenty-three minutes.”
Poirot smiled.
“Exactly.”
He picked up the travelling coat.
“Inside the compartment, the man removes this.”
He laid it on the table.
“The hat.”
Beside it.
“Gloves.”
Then the cane.
“He need not change his entire costume?”
I asked.
“No elaborate costume is necessary. Under the outer things he may be dressed ordinarily.”
Rooke said:
“That would still leave witnesses in the corridor.”
Poirot looked at him.
“Before departure?”
Rooke paused.
“People are moving constantly.”
“Precisely.”
Poirot continued.
“The man enters as Sir Claud Mercer.”
He removed the hat from an imaginary head.
“He leaves as nobody in particular.”
Japp’s eyes narrowed.
“That simple?”
“That is why it succeeds.”
I saw Victoria again in my mind.
Porters.
Steam.
Doors.
Newspapers.
Passengers moving in every direction.
A man who had entered a first-class carriage in a dark coat could emerge several minutes later in an ordinary suit and become instantly uninteresting.
No one was looking for the man who left.
Everyone was remembering the man who arrived.
“What time?” I asked.
Poirot turned.
“What time does he leave?”
“We believe approximately nine-twenty-six.”
Japp looked at his notes.
“That gives him nine minutes inside.”
“Enough.”
I pictured the actions.
Coat off.
Hat removed.
Gloves.
Cane against the seat.
Dispatch case positioned.
Newspaper placed.
Perhaps a glance through the corridor door.
Then out.
Walking away among hundreds of other men.
“And at nine-forty,” I said slowly, “the train leaves with the compartment already empty.”
“Yes.”
“Nine-forty-nine Bell brings the tea.”
“Yes.”
“He finds nobody.”
“Yes.”
“But leaves it because he was instructed to.”
“Yes.”
“And Pike finds the same empty compartment at ten-three.”
Poirot nodded.
I felt almost foolish.
Not because I had missed some impossible piece of machinery.
Because there had been no machinery.
“So the warm tea—”
“Arrived after the man had left.”
“And the slowdown—”
“Could have lasted an hour.”
“The search of the corridor—”
“Perfectly competent.”
I glanced toward the boardroom windows.
“The entire impossibility took place before the train moved.”
“No,” said Poirot.
I looked at him.
“No?”
“The entire impossibility took place here.”
He touched his forehead.
For once I understood him immediately.
In our assumptions.
Japp shut his notebook.
“Fine. We’ve got a method.”
He looked toward Rooke.
“Now we need a man.”
Rooke met his gaze.
“I presume, Inspector, that is why I have been asked here.”
Japp said nothing.
Rooke continued.
“It is no secret that I knew Sir Claud’s travel arrangements. It was my job.”
Poirot nodded.
“Yes.”
“I arranged railway reservations.”
“Yes.”
“Tickets.”
“Yes.”
“Correspondence.”
“Yes.”
“Meetings.”
“Yes.”
“The papers for the Armand transaction.”
“Yes.”
Rooke’s tone sharpened slightly.
“If those ordinary duties are now evidence of murder, every private secretary in London should be nervous.”
“Not at all,” said Poirot.
“Then I fail to see—”
“Your duties are not evidence of murder.”
Rooke’s mouth tightened.
“They are evidence of access.”
That stopped him.
Japp opened the folder beneath his arm.
“And we’ve got something more than access.”
He laid several sheets on the table.
“Miss Cole’s account numbers.”
Rooke glanced at her.
Miss Cole did not look away.
Japp continued.
“We’ve been through them.”
Rooke said:
“I told you there are ordinary explanations for transfers between investment accounts.”
“There are.”
“Then—”
“Individually.”
Japp placed another sheet beside the first.
“But not when you line them up.”
Rooke’s face remained composed.
“What exactly are you alleging?”
“Money moved from legitimate accounts into temporary holdings. Then through two subsidiary investment vehicles. Then portions disappear under adjustments and fees.”
“That is a crude description.”
“Good. Give me a better one.”
Rooke stepped closer.
“These transactions involve settlements, currency differences, brokerage charges, temporary balances—”
“Over nine months?”
“Yes.”
“Always through accounts you could authorize?”
“I could authorize hundreds of accounts.”
“Exactly.”
Rooke looked toward Poirot.
“This is absurd.”
Poirot said:
“Miss Cole noticed the pattern.”
“She is a ledger clerk.”
Miss Cole’s face became very still.
“Yes, Mr Rooke.”
There was something in those four words which made him turn.
She continued.
“A ledger clerk notices figures.”
Rooke drew himself up.
“I meant no offence.”
“I know exactly what you meant.”
Japp almost smiled.
Miss Cole placed her notebook on the table.
“I copied the references because they were concealed too neatly to be accidental.”
Rooke said:
“You had no authority to remove or copy private records.”
“No.”
“You might have compromised client information.”
“Yes.”
“And now, because Sir Claud is dead, you have decided your suspicions must be correct.”
“I decided nothing.”
She pointed to the sheets.
“He did.”
Japp looked pleased.
Poirot remained grave.
“When did Sir Claud ask for these ledgers?”
“Sunday afternoon,” Miss Cole said.
“And he examined them Monday morning?”
“Yes.”
“Before Mr Rooke arrived?”
“Yes.”
Rooke said:
“You cannot know what Sir Claud concluded.”
“No,” Poirot replied.
“But we know what he did next.”
Rooke’s eyes moved toward him.
“He asked to see you.”
A pause.
“Sir Claud saw me every morning.”
“Not at eight-five.”
“He was travelling.”
“Therefore the early meeting was unusual.”
Rooke gave the faintest shrug.
“Important correspondence.”
“What correspondence?”
“I would have to consult my diary.”
“Ah.”
Poirot’s voice was soft.
“The man who remembers every railway arrangement has forgotten the urgent correspondence.”
For the first time Rooke showed irritation.
“I have answered hundreds of questions in two days.”
“Indeed.”
Japp stepped in.
“We’ve also been to the bank.”
Rooke turned toward him.
“I was there at ten-fifteen.”
“No dispute.”
That seemed to restore something in him.
“Then you know I could not have been travelling on the train.”
Japp looked at Poirot.
Poirot said:
“No one needed to travel on the train.”
Rooke’s face became expressionless.
Japp pulled another note from his pocket.
“We checked the journey.”
“What journey?”
“Victoria to the City.”
Rooke said nothing.
“A man leaving the platform around nine-twenty-six has time to be clear of the station shortly after half past nine, take a cab, and get to your bank before ten-fifteen.”
“That depends entirely upon traffic.”
“Of course.”
“It is hardly proof.”
“No.”
Japp smiled.
“But it does rather spoil the alibi.”
Rooke looked at him.
“My presence at the bank was never intended as an alibi.”
I remembered otherwise.
He had offered the timestamp himself.
Poirot remembered too.
Naturally.
“You brought us the confirmation,” he said.
“Because you were establishing everyone’s movements.”
“Yes.”
Rooke’s voice remained level.
“And my movements were established.”
“At ten-fifteen.”
Rooke did not answer.
Poirot turned back to the table.
I began to understand the shape of what he had been constructing.
Access.
Opportunity.
Motive.
But motive for what?
Embezzlement might explain Mercer’s murder.
It did not completely explain the train.
I asked the question.
“If Rooke—or whoever it was—had already killed Mercer, why create the journey at all?”
Poirot looked at me approvingly.
“Excellent.”
Rooke’s eyes flicked toward him.
Poirot continued.
“Suppose Sir Claud Mercer simply disappears from his office and is later found dead.”
“Murder.”
“Immediately.”
“Yes.”
“But suppose Sir Claud is seen leaving London.”
I looked toward the coat.
“Then everyone assumes he was alive later.”
“Yes.”
“And if he appears to leave with valuable securities?”
Japp answered.
“Then when he disappears, maybe he ran off with them.”
Poirot nodded.
“The dead man becomes the suspect.”
That struck me with considerable force.
Dr Armand’s securities.
The empty dispatch case.
The railway journey.
Mercer’s reputation for financial exactness.
If he vanished while supposedly carrying valuable bearer instruments, rumours would begin immediately.
Perhaps he had taken them.
Perhaps the accounts of Mercer & Vale were not as sound as everyone believed.
Perhaps his disappearance was flight.
Miss Cole said quietly:
“He would have hated that more than death.”
No one answered.
It was probably true.
Poirot looked at the arrangement on the table.
“The railway performance gave the murderer something very valuable.”
“Time?” I asked.
“Time, certainly.”
He looked at Rooke.
“And confusion.”
Rooke said:
“You speak as though all this is established.”
“No.”
Poirot’s tone was almost pleasant.
“I speak as though it is interesting.”
Japp said:
“And if somebody had been dipping into Mercer’s accounts, Mercer appearing to abscond with securities would make the missing money look rather different.”
“Exactly.”
Rooke stepped away from the table.
“You have decided upon your culprit.”
Poirot shook his head.
“I decide upon facts.”
“That is a convenient distinction.”
“Very.”
Rooke gave a short laugh.
“You cannot possibly believe I impersonated Sir Claud at Victoria.”
Poirot regarded him.
“Why not?”
The question was so direct that even Japp looked surprised.
Rooke recovered quickly.
“Because it is fantastic.”
“You knew his journey.”
“That was my work.”
“His reservation.”
“Yes.”
“His ticket.”
“Yes.”
“His coat was in this office.”
“I knew that.”
“His cane also.”
“Frequently.”
“The dispatch case.”
“I prepared papers for it.”
“The tea?”
Rooke frowned.
“What of it?”
“You knew Sir Claud’s habits.”
“After twelve years one learns certain things.”
“Yet the person at Victoria ordered tea.”
Rooke gave an impatient movement.
“You have already established that the order proves nothing.”
“On the contrary. It proves something very charming.”
Rooke looked at him.
“The impersonator thought tea looked right.”
I nearly smiled.
Poirot touched the cup.
“Tea on an English train. Very proper. Very recognizable.”
Eleanor said:
“Except Sir Claud would have ordered coffee.”
“Yes.”
Poirot touched the newspaper.
“And a newspaper is proper.”
He unfolded it.
“But Sir Claud would have opened this page.”
The financial page.
He placed it down.
“A hat and gloves upon the seat are proper.”
Eleanor said:
“But Sir Claud used the rack.”
“Yes.”
“The cane,” I said. “He failed to shift it before the carriage step.”
Poirot looked at me.
“Very good.”
The clues had ceased to be separate.
That was what astonished me.
The coffee had seemed trivial.
The knee seemed incidental.
The folded newspaper a curiosity.
The hat and gloves a matter of tidiness.
Now they all said the same thing.
Someone had reproduced Sir Claud Mercer from the outside.
Rooke said:
“You could make such a list about anyone.”
Poirot nodded.
“That is true.”
“Then none of it identifies me.”
“No.”
The answer seemed to surprise him.
Poirot continued.
“But it tells me something about the person who did it.”
“What?”
“He was accustomed to arranging Sir Claud.”
Rooke’s face changed by so little that I might have imagined it.
Poirot continued calmly.
“The reservations. The correspondence. The ticket. The papers. The objects that should accompany him. The things another man would expect to see around him.”
Rooke said:
“A secretary does exactly that.”
“Yes.”
“And therefore?”
Poirot smiled.
“For the moment, therefore nothing.”
Japp muttered something under his breath.
Poirot appeared not to hear.
I noticed then that the dispatch case had been moved to the center of the table.
Japp unlocked it.
The contents had been preserved separately and now lay in neat piles.
Company circulars.
Blank forms.
Several typed memoranda.
Ordinary papers.
No securities.
Poirot looked at them for a long moment.
“The case,” he said, “is perhaps my favourite object.”
I was surprised.
“Not the tea?”
“The tea is charming. The case is proud.”
Japp stared.
“The case is what?”
“Proud.”
“I knew we’d get into trouble eventually.”
Poirot ignored him.
“When Captain Hastings first lifted it—”
“I never lifted it.”
“You wished to.”
“That is not the same thing.”
“You looked at it and thought: important.”
“Yes.”
“Why?”
“Leather. Initials. Locked. Mercer was carrying valuable securities.”
“Exactly.”
He placed several blank forms inside.
“Weight.”
Then circulars.
“More weight.”
He closed the lid.
“A substantial case containing substantial business.”
“But it didn’t,” I said.
“No.”
“It only needed to feel as though it did.”
Poirot reopened it.
“The railway scene tells us the same thing again and again. An object is made to signify something beyond itself.”
The coat signified Mercer.
The ticket signified travel.
The tea signified occupancy.
The case signified securities.
“But none of them actually proves the thing,” I said.
Poirot smiled.
“My dear Hastings, you have become positively dangerous.”
Japp lifted one of the memoranda.
“We kept the exact contents quiet, as you asked.”
Poirot nodded.
Rooke looked toward them.
“What purpose does that serve?”
“Sometimes,” said Poirot, “silence is an excellent witness.”
He began arranging the papers upon the table.
I watched.
There was something deliberate in his movements now.
Not merely his usual precision.
A purpose.
The company circulars were stacked first.
Then several blank forms.
A memorandum.
Another sheet.
Japp watched him too.
Rooke stood perhaps six feet away.
Poirot said:
“You told us, Mr Rooke, that you assembled papers for Sir Claud’s journey.”
“I placed certain documents on his desk.”
“Which?”
“Correspondence concerning Armand. The memorandum on the collateral arrangements. Blank transfer forms. Several company summaries.”
“Did you pack the dispatch case?”
“No.”
“Who did?”
“Sir Claud.”
“You saw him do it?”
“No.”
“Then how do you know?”
“Because he preferred to handle bearer instruments personally.”
“That was not my question.”
Rooke paused.
“You asked who packed the case.”
“Yes.”
“I assume Sir Claud did.”
Poirot nodded.
“Assumptions.”
The word almost echoed.
He turned to Japp.
“The case was locked when recovered?”
“Yes.”
“Opened in the presence of witnesses?”
“Yes.”
“Contents listed?”
“Yes.”
“Published?”
“No.”
“Described to the staff?”
“No.”
Japp’s eyes narrowed.
“No one outside the investigation knows how the papers were arranged.”
Rooke said:
“I know what papers I gave Sir Claud.”
“Of course.”
Poirot lifted one memorandum.
It was an ordinary typed company sheet.
Nothing about it looked remarkable.
I remembered seeing it when the case had first been opened.
At the time I had scarcely noticed it.
Poirot looked toward Miss Cole.
“Was this typed on Monday morning?”
She examined it.
“Yes. The final line was added after eight.”
“How do you know?”
“My initials are on the carbon.”
Rooke shifted slightly.
Poirot did not appear to notice.
Instead he looked at the paper as though mildly dissatisfied.
“Hm.”
He put it down.
Then turned to me.
“Hastings, when the dispatch case was opened, you remember these papers?”
“Certainly.”
“The circulars?”
“Yes.”
“The forms?”
“Yes.”
“And this memorandum?”
“I remember it.”
“How was it placed?”
I thought.
“I couldn’t say.”
Poirot nodded.
“Quite.”
Japp looked at him sharply.
I suddenly understood that we had arrived somewhere.
Rooke must have sensed it too.
He said:
“If there is nothing further, Inspector, I have considerable business awaiting me.”
Japp did not answer.
Poirot began placing the papers back into the case.
Slowly.
Casually.
Almost absent-mindedly.
He laid the blank forms first.
Then several circulars.
Finally he picked up the memorandum.
“The whole thing,” he said, “is very simple once one understands the arrangement.”
Rooke’s eyes were on his hands.
Poirot continued.
“The circulars beneath. The blank forms above. And this memorandum lying flat below them.”
He slid the memorandum toward the bottom of the pile.
There was a tiny pause.
Rooke said:
“No.”
The word was automatic.
Poirot stopped.
Rooke was staring at the papers.
“It wasn’t flat beneath them.”
No one moved.
Rooke seemed suddenly to hear his own voice.
Poirot held the memorandum perfectly still.
Rooke said:
“It was folded around the forms.”
Silence filled the boardroom.
Japp slowly turned toward him.
Rooke’s face had lost every trace of colour.
Japp spoke very quietly.
“How do you know that?”
THE NEW CASES OF HERCULE POIROT
From the Recollections of Captain Arthur Hastings
THE AFFAIR OF THE EMPTY COMPARTMENT
PART SIX
POIROT EXPLAINS
“How do you know that?”
Japp’s question fell into the silence of the boardroom with extraordinary force.
Martin Rooke did not answer.
His eyes were fixed upon the memorandum in Poirot’s hand.
Only a few seconds earlier he had corrected Poirot almost automatically.
The paper had not lain flat beneath the blank forms.
It had been folded around them.
He had said it with the instinctive irritation of a precise man hearing an arrangement wrongly described.
Now he seemed to understand what he had done.
Miss Cole stood motionless near the window.
Eleanor Vale had turned toward Rooke.
I was conscious of the clock upon the mantel. Its ticking, which I had scarcely noticed all afternoon, had suddenly become intolerably loud.
Japp repeated the question.
“How do you know that, Mr Rooke?”
Rooke drew a breath.
“Because I prepared the papers.”
“That wasn’t what I asked.”
“I gave Sir Claud that memorandum.”
Poirot looked at him.
“Yes.”
“The blank forms as well.”
“Yes.”
“It is hardly remarkable that I should remember how they were arranged.”
Poirot shook his head.
“You did not say how you gave them to Sir Claud. You corrected how they were found inside the locked dispatch case.”
Rooke’s voice sharpened.
“Sir Claud may have told me.”
“May he?”
“He was particular about such things.”
“Indeed.”
“He might easily have mentioned that he folded the memorandum around the forms.”
Poirot looked almost regretful.
“No, Mr Rooke.”
Rooke stared at him.
Poirot laid the memorandum carefully upon the table.
“Come closer, Hastings.”
I obeyed.
He pointed to the fold.
At first I saw nothing except the crease running down the paper.
Then he touched one of the typed lines.
“The crease crosses this sentence.”
“Yes.”
Miss Cole spoke from behind us.
“That sentence was added Monday morning.”
Rooke turned toward her.
She continued in her usual matter-of-fact tone.
“The memorandum was retyped on Friday, but Sir Claud changed one clause. I had the alteration added Monday morning. The carbon carries my initials.”
Poirot nodded.
“At what time?”
“After eight.”
“And before?”
“Before the papers were sent finally to Sir Claud.”
Poirot looked back at Rooke.
“So the fold could not have existed when the memorandum was originally prepared. It was made after this final line was typed.”
Rooke said:
“Then Sir Claud folded it afterward.”
“Perhaps.”
“Then there is no difficulty.”
“There would be none,” said Poirot, “if you had seen him do it.”
“I may have.”
“You told us you did not.”
Rooke’s mouth tightened.
Poirot continued quietly.
“You said Sir Claud packed the case himself because he handled bearer securities personally. You said you did not see him pack it. You said you merely supplied the papers.”
Rooke looked toward Japp.
“This is wordplay.”
Japp shook his head.
“No. That’s a statement.”
Poirot lifted the memorandum.
“The exact arrangement of these papers was never published. It was not described to the staff. The case remained locked until the police opened it. Yet when I deliberately put this memorandum in the wrong place, you corrected me.”
Rooke said nothing.
“You knew the paper was folded around the forms because you put it there.”
The secretary’s face seemed to become older.
Poirot did not raise his voice.
“You packed Sir Claud Mercer’s dispatch case after Sir Claud Mercer was dead.”
Rooke’s eyes moved slowly toward him.
“And you know that,” he said, “because of a crease in a piece of paper?”
“No.”
Poirot glanced at me.
“That is only the last piece.”
He looked again at Rooke.
“I know it because you murdered Sir Claud Mercer.”
No one moved.
There are accusations which produce an explosion.
This one produced only stillness.
Rooke’s hand rested upon the back of a chair.
His fingers tightened against the polished wood.
Japp said:
“You’d better listen.”
Rooke gave a short laugh.
“Listen to what? A fantasy?”
Poirot drew out the chair opposite him.
“To a timetable.”
That, I confess, was so precisely Poirot that even at such a moment I nearly smiled.
He sat.
“Let us begin at the beginning.”
Rooke remained standing.
Poirot looked toward the clock.
“Monday morning. Sir Claud Mercer reaches this building unusually early, at approximately a quarter to eight.”
Miss Cole nodded.
“He has asked for several ledgers.”
Poirot touched her notebook.
“Because Miss Cole has noticed something.”
Japp said:
“Money.”
“Not money lying openly upon a table,” Poirot continued. “That would be crude. Small transfers. Temporary holdings. Adjustments. Fees. Money passing between accounts in ways which appear ordinary when one looks at each transaction separately.”
Miss Cole said:
“But not when one compares them.”
“Exactly.”
Poirot turned to Rooke.
“You depended upon nobody comparing them.”
Rooke said nothing.
“For twelve years you had managed the details of Sir Claud’s business life. You knew which accounts were reviewed together and which were not. You knew where small movements would appear natural. You knew which signatures could be obtained routinely and which questions would not be asked.”
“That proves nothing.”
“No. But it explains much.”
Japp opened his file.
“We’ve traced enough already.”
Rooke looked at him.
Japp continued.
“The transfers run through accounts you administered. Maybe not exclusively. Enough of them.”
“There are explanations.”
“For some.”
“For all.”
“You can give them at the station.”
Rooke’s eyes hardened.
Poirot lifted one hand.
“We are not yet at the station, Japp.”
Japp almost smiled.
“No. Apparently we’re still at quarter to eight.”
“At eight-five,” said Poirot, “Mr Rooke arrives.”
He looked directly at him.
“Sir Claud confronts you.”
Rooke said:
“You cannot know what was said.”
“No. But we know what Sir Claud intended to do.”
Miss Cole glanced toward the papers.
Poirot continued.
“He had found enough irregularity to demand an explanation. He intended to notify the bank. If necessary, the police.”
Something moved in Rooke’s face.
Not fear.
Memory.
Poirot saw it.
“You understood what that meant. Not merely the loss of a position. Prison. Disgrace. The destruction of the reputation you had built as the indispensable Martin Rooke—the man who never made an error.”
Rooke said softly:
“You know nothing about me.”
“On the contrary. I know something very important. You dislike disorder.”
He paused.
“You and I have that in common.”
Rooke stared.
“But when disorder came, I tried to understand it.”
Poirot’s expression hardened almost imperceptibly.
“You tried to kill it.”
The room seemed colder.
“At approximately eighteen minutes past eight,” he continued, “the argument reaches the private records room.”
I saw again the narrow chamber.
The deed cases.
The dark recess.
The bronze weight from Mercer’s desk.
“Sir Claud tells you it is finished.”
Rooke said nothing.
“You take the bronze desk weight.”
Still no answer.
“You strike him.”
Eleanor looked down.
Poirot’s voice remained restrained.
“One blow. Enough.”
Rooke’s fingers loosened from the chair.
“You hide the body behind the deed cases in the deep recess. You lock the records room.”
Japp said:
“Eight-twenty-four, near enough.”
Poirot nodded.
“And now, Mr Rooke, you have a problem.”
Rooke gave him a strange look.
“A dead employer,” I said.
Poirot turned to me.
“More than that, Hastings. A dead employer who is expected somewhere else.”
I understood.
“The train.”
“Yes.”
He stood again.
“Sir Claud was scheduled to leave Victoria on the Channel express. Everyone who mattered knew it. His reservation existed. His ticket had been arranged. His luggage was expected. And most important—”
He touched the dispatch case.
“—he was believed to be carrying securities of great value.”
Dr Armand’s securities.
The apparent fortune missing from that case had drawn our attention almost from the beginning.
Poirot looked at Rooke.
“Perhaps the murder itself was not planned long in advance.”
Rooke’s eyes flickered.
“But everything afterward was.”
Poirot opened the dispatch case.
“At approximately eight-twenty-eight, you create the first arrangement.”
He placed circulars inside.
“Company papers.”
Blank forms.
“Nothing valuable.”
Then the memorandum.
“Documents sufficient to give the case weight and importance.”
I said:
“The securities were never in it.”
“Not that morning.”
Japp nodded.
“We’ll account for them through his financial papers. They never reached the train.”
Poirot closed the case.
“The case did not need to contain a fortune. It needed only to make everyone believe a fortune had disappeared.”
Just as the coat did not need to contain Mercer.
The thought struck me before Poirot said it.
At eight-thirty-four, he continued, Rooke went to the travelling things Sir Claud kept at the office.
The dark coat.
The felt hat.
The gloves.
The silver-headed cane.
Mrs Webb’s evidence had established their location.
Poirot touched each object as he spoke.
“You did not require theatrical make-up, Mr Rooke. No beard. No mask. No elaborate transformation.”
I looked at Rooke.
We had known him all through the investigation: roughly Mercer’s general build, quiet in movement, able to disappear into the background of a room.
Poirot continued.
“You needed to be Sir Claud for seconds at a time. And only to people who already expected to see Sir Claud.”
He lifted the coat.
“Over your own suit.”
The hat.
“Head partly lowered.”
The cane.
“This in your hand.”
The case.
“And this to complete the picture.”
Rooke said quietly:
“Ridiculous.”
“Is it?”
Poirot faced me.
“Hastings, at Victoria, what did Albert Pym see?”
I answered slowly.
“Mercer’s coat. The cane. The case.”
“And?”
“A man of the right general figure.”
“And he knew?”
“That Mercer was taking the train.”
Poirot nodded.
“At approximately eight-forty-one, Mr Rooke takes a taxi toward Victoria.”
He walked slowly around the table as though walking through the station itself.
“Nine-two. Albert Pym sees the expected gentleman.”
I could hear the station again.
Porters shouting.
Steam.
Carriage doors.
Pym saying, “Morning, Sir Claud.”
Poirot said:
“Observe the beauty of that. Pym supplies the name.”
He turned toward Rooke.
“You do not introduce yourself. He does it for you.”
Rooke’s face remained rigid.
“You ask whether the train is on time. You give him the bag. You say only what is necessary.”
Poirot tapped the clipped ticket.
“Nine-six. The ticket passes the barrier.”
I said:
“And we treated that as proof Mercer travelled.”
“Yes. But the ticket proves only that the ticket travelled as far as the platform.”
“Nine-ten,” said Japp.
“Major Fenwick,” Poirot continued.
Fenwick was not present, but his angry certainty seemed almost to enter the room.
“He has come looking for Sir Claud. He is full of resentment. He expects to see the man he hates.”
Poirot lifted the silver-headed cane.
“He sees this.”
The coat.
“This.”
The hat.
“And this.”
I said:
“But not the face clearly.”
“And does not speak.”
Poirot replaced the hat.
“Expectation completes the portrait.”
“Nine-thirteen,” said Japp.
“The tea,” I said.
Poirot smiled.
“Ah, yes. The tea.”
He looked at Rooke.
“You arrange for tea to be brought after departure. But you add a curious instruction. If Sir Claud is not in his seat, the tea is to be left anyway.”
“Which means,” I said, “it could arrive in an empty compartment.”
“As it did.”
Poirot touched the railway cup.
“The warm tea was the finest witness in the case, Hastings.”
“I should say the worst.”
“No. It told the exact truth.”
He looked at me.
“It said only: ‘I have recently been delivered.’ You insisted that it said: ‘Sir Claud Mercer was recently alive.’”
I could hardly argue.
“At nine-seventeen,” Poirot continued, “Eleanor Vale sees the supposed Sir Claud enter the carriage.”
Eleanor nodded.
“I saw the coat and cane.”
“Yes.”
“And I expected him.”
“Yes.”
Poirot’s expression softened.
“But you saw one thing that did not fit.”
“My uncle’s knee,” Julian said from near the door.
He and Eleanor had arrived during the later part of the confrontation, and I had scarcely noticed.
Eleanor looked toward him.
“Sir Claud always hesitated on the first carriage step.”
Poirot nodded.
“And shifted the cane.”
“Yes.”
“Mr Rooke forgot.”
Rooke said nothing.
“A perfect disguise,” said Poirot, “would reproduce the face. An intelligent disguise reproduces what people recognize. But a living man is made also of habits he himself does not think about.”
Poirot lowered the cane.
“You copied Sir Claud’s appearance.”
He looked at Rooke.
“You did not copy his knee.”
That line, simple as it was, seemed to finish something.
Poirot continued.
“At approximately nine-twenty-one you are inside the reserved compartment.”
He removed the coat from the table and laid it down.
“You take off the coat.”
The hat.
“The hat.”
The gloves.
“The gloves.”
“Underneath,” I said, “your own suit.”
Poirot glanced at me approvingly.
“Exactly.”
He placed the cane against the table.
“The cane is left where it must be seen.”
He turned the dispatch case so the initials faced outward.
“The case is displayed.”
The newspaper.
“The newspaper remains folded.”
Eleanor said:
“Sir Claud would have opened the financial page.”
“Yes.”
Poirot placed the hat upon the imagined seat.
“The hat and gloves are put here.”
“Where Sir Claud would never have left them,” Eleanor said.
“Yes.”
“And the tea,” I added. “Mercer drank coffee.”
Poirot turned toward me.
“Exactly.”
There was a curious satisfaction in seeing it now.
Each little fact I had dismissed stood in its proper place.
The tea had seemed right for a railway gentleman.
The newspaper seemed right.
The hat.
The cane.
Everything was right in the way that a stage drawing-room is right.
Recognizable.
Not lived in.
Poirot said:
“Mr Rooke knew Sir Claud extremely well in one sense. His appointments. His correspondence. His trains. His papers. His public arrangements.”
He paused.
“But he did not inhabit Sir Claud’s body.”
The right knee.
The coffee.
The instinctive place for the gloves.
The financial page.
“All the mistakes,” Poirot said, “are mistakes of arrangement.”
Rooke’s expression changed.
That word reached him.
Poirot continued.
“At nine-twenty-six, the work is finished.”
He looked toward the imagined carriage door.
“You are once again Martin Rooke.”
I could see it.
A quiet man in an ordinary suit.
No one looking at him.
No one calling his name.
“You walk down the corridor,” said Poirot. “You open the door. You step onto the platform.”
Rooke’s gaze shifted toward the window.
“And that,” Poirot said, “is the great disappearance.”
I nearly laughed.
Not from humour.
From the sheer simplicity.
“The man who entered as Mercer,” I said, “walked away as Rooke.”
“Yes.”
“And nobody noticed.”
“Why should they?”
Poirot spread his hands.
“Everyone was looking for Sir Claud Mercer.”
He looked at the secretary.
“No one was looking for you.”
Those words seemed to strike Rooke more deeply than the accusation of murder.
At approximately nine-thirty-two, Poirot continued, Rooke took a taxi back toward the City.
The train still stood at Victoria.
At nine-forty it departed.
“The compartment,” I said, “was empty before it moved.”
“Exactly.”
“At nine-forty-nine Bell brought the tea.”
“Yes.”
“He found it empty.”
“Yes.”
“He called.”
“Yes.”
“And because he’d been told to leave the tray if the passenger was absent—”
“He left it.”
“At ten-three Pike found the compartment.”
Poirot nodded.
“The coat.”
“The hat.”
“The cane.”
“The newspaper.”
“The case.”
“The tea.”
“And no man.”
“Yes.”
I shook my head.
“And then the train slowed under signals.”
Poirot’s eyes twinkled.
“Ah, Hastings. Your three magnificent minutes.”
Japp laughed.
“I thought we’d get back to those.”
I had sufficient grace to join them.
“I searched embankments.”
“Yes.”
“Service roads.”
“Yes.”
“I calculated the speed at which a man could jump.”
“With great diligence.”
“I considered another railway line.”
“You did.”
I looked at him.
“And all the while the fellow had stepped down at Victoria.”
Poirot smiled.
“My dear Hastings, you searched every mile of railway except the platform.”
Even Rooke’s presence could not entirely prevent my embarrassment.
“At least,” I said, “I was thorough.”
“Magnificently.”
Poirot turned serious again.
“Guard Pike was correct. Nobody passed him. Nobody jumped from the train. Nobody escaped during the signal check.”
Because there had been nobody to escape.
“And the bank?” Rooke said suddenly.
It was the first time he had spoken in several minutes.
Poirot turned.
“You were there.”
“At ten-fifteen.”
“Yes.”
“Two clerks saw me.”
“Yes.”
“My signature is recorded.”
“Yes.”
“Then—”
“Then at ten-fifteen you were at the bank.”
Rooke stopped.
Poirot said:
“A true fact, Mr Rooke. Like the clipped ticket. Like the warm tea.”
Japp took up the timing sheet.
“We ran the journey. Plenty of margin. Off the train nine-twenty-six. Out of Victoria. Cab around half past nine. City by ten-fifteen without anything miraculous.”
Rooke said:
“Depending upon traffic.”
“Depending upon ordinary traffic,” Japp replied.
“It proves nothing.”
“It proves you had time.”
Poirot nodded.
“And the timestamp which appeared to exclude you does nothing of the kind.”
He looked almost sadly at Rooke.
“You have been defeated throughout by true facts.”
That, I thought, was precisely it.
Nothing had lied.
The ticket had been clipped.
The tea had been warm.
Fenwick had seen a man in Mercer’s coat.
Eleanor had seen that man climb aboard.
Rooke had been at the bank at ten-fifteen.
Every fact was true.
We had simply made them say more than they knew.
Poirot returned to the beginning.
“Meanwhile Sir Claud lies here, in the records room.”
The atmosphere of the boardroom changed at once.
The railway trick, fascinating as it was, had almost made us forget the dead man.
“Miss Cole begins looking for him at eleven-thirty-five,” said Poirot. “The locked records room troubles her. At twelve-ten the body is found.”
Rooke closed his eyes briefly.
“That was not in your plan,” Poirot said.
“No.”
It was spoken so softly that for a moment I wondered whether I had heard correctly.
Poirot did not react.
“You hoped Sir Claud’s apparent flight would dominate the day. Perhaps longer. The missing securities would make the disappearance look financial. The irregular accounts might even be attributed to Sir Claud himself.”
Rooke opened his eyes.
Poirot continued.
“The dead man would acquire a new character.”
Miss Cole said:
“A thief.”
“Yes.”
“Sir Claud was many things,” she said. “But not that.”
Poirot inclined his head.
“That mattered to the plan. If a man famous for financial discipline suddenly disappears carrying bearer securities, people begin to ask whether the discipline was merely a mask.”
Dr Armand’s troubled reaction returned to me.
He had feared exactly that.
Rooke said:
“You cannot prove that was my intention.”
Japp tapped the ledger papers.
“We can prove why you needed one.”
Poirot nodded.
“Miss Cole had found the money.”
“I had found irregularities,” she corrected.
Poirot smiled faintly.
“Quite so.”
Japp said:
“And we’ve followed enough of them. You can explain the rest formally.”
Rooke looked at the rows of figures.
Something in him seemed to sag.
Poirot said:
“It began with a loss, perhaps?”
Rooke’s head came up.
For the first time genuine surprise entered his face.
“How—”
“You told yourself you would put it back.”
Rooke stared.
Poirot did not press.
After a long pause, Rooke said:
“Yes.”
The word was almost inaudible.
Julian shifted uneasily.
Rooke looked not at us but at the table.
“A private investment.”
No one interrupted.
“It failed.”
His voice had changed.
The precise secretary was disappearing.
“I needed time. It was simple to move the amount temporarily. Sir Claud signed a hundred papers a week. He did not see everything.”
Miss Cole said quietly:
“But you did.”
Rooke looked at her.
“Yes.”
There was bitterness in it.
“I saw everything.”
Poirot waited.
Rooke continued.
“I intended to restore it.”
“And then?” Poirot asked.
“Another loss.”
“And another transfer.”
“Yes.”
“And eventually?”
Rooke laughed, but there was no amusement in it.
“Eventually I discovered something.”
“What?”
“That the great Sir Claud Mercer did not know his own empire.”
He looked around the boardroom.
“He knew figures. He knew markets. He knew when a shipping line moved two points in Rotterdam. But he did not know how this place worked.”
Miss Cole’s face tightened.
“I did.”
Rooke struck his chest lightly with two fingers.
“I knew which letters had to be answered. Which director’s wife must be remembered. Which train connected with which boat. Which bank manager could be kept waiting and which could not. I knew the birthdays. The meetings. The cables. The files. The names.”
His voice rose slightly, then he caught it.
“For twelve years I arranged his life.”
Poirot said nothing.
Rooke looked at him.
“Do you know what Sir Claud called me?”
Poirot waited.
“Rooke.”
The answer sounded absurd.
Then I understood.
“Never Martin?”
“No.”
He smiled bitterly.
“Not once that I remember.”
His eyes moved toward Mercer’s empty chair.
“If everything went well, he did not see me. If something went wrong, then he saw me.”
Poirot watched him closely.
“The money became more than money,” he said.
Rooke looked at him.
“Yes.”
There was almost relief in the admission.
“It proved I existed.”
No one spoke.
“I could move thousands beneath his nose. Alter the course of things. He would sit there believing that he controlled every penny in the building.”
Rooke’s mouth twisted.
“He controlled nothing he did not know to ask about.”
“And when he discovered it?” Poirot asked.
Rooke’s face hardened.
“He looked at me as though I were a faulty adding machine.”
Eleanor turned away.
“He said the police would be informed. The bank. The partners. He spoke about me in the third person while I stood in front of him.”
Rooke’s hands closed.
“Twelve years.”
He looked at Poirot.
“Twelve years of making his world possible.”
Poirot said quietly:
“And so you killed him.”
Rooke’s anger faltered.
For a moment he looked almost tired.
“I struck him.”
“Yes.”
“I did not go there intending—”
“I believe you.”
Rooke blinked.
“The murder may have been born in the moment,” Poirot said. “The arrangement was not.”
Rooke looked at the objects on the table.
The coat.
Cane.
Hat.
Case.
Newspaper.
Cup.
He sank slowly into the chair.
“To him I was never a man,” he said.
No one answered.
Rooke stared at the table.
“I was a function.”
Poirot stood very still.
Then he said:
“That may be true.”
Japp looked toward him, surprised.
Poirot continued.
“But it does not excuse you.”
“I did not say—”
“Yes, you did.”
His voice remained gentle.
“You say Sir Claud reduced you to a function. An appointment kept. A train reserved. A paper put in its proper place.”
Rooke looked at him.
“And what did you do to Sir Claud?”
Rooke said nothing.
“You reduced him to a coat.”
Poirot touched it.
“A cane.”
His fingers rested upon the silver handle.
“A ticket.”
The little rectangle of card.
“A dispatch case.”
“A newspaper.”
Finally the cup.
“And tea.”
The room was absolutely silent.
“You complain that he failed to see the man in you.”
Poirot’s expression was grave.
“But your crime depended upon the same error.”
He looked directly at Rooke.
“You believed that if all the expected objects were arranged correctly, the man himself no longer mattered.”
Rooke lowered his eyes.
Japp closed the file.
“That’ll do.”
He crossed to Rooke.
“Martin Rooke, I’m taking you into custody in connection with the murder of Sir Claud Mercer.”
There was no struggle.
No protest.
Rooke merely stood.
For a moment he looked at the boardroom as though memorizing where everything had been placed.
Then his gaze fell upon the dispatch case.
“The securities?” Japp asked.
Rooke did not answer.
“We’ll find them.”
Poirot said:
“They were never aboard the train.”
Rooke gave the faintest nod.
That was enough.
Japp motioned toward the door.
Rooke walked out between him and the constable.
The door closed.
The clock continued ticking.
For a surprisingly long time no one spoke.
Then Miss Cole began gathering the ledger papers.
Japp, returning a few moments later, watched her.
“You did well, Miss Cole.”
She looked up.
“I copied figures.”
“That’s what caught him.”
She considered this.
“Then I copied them accurately.”
And that was all the satisfaction she required.
Julian Mercer stood near Eleanor.
The clearing of the murder suspicion did not, unfortunately, make his own troubles disappear.
Japp regarded him.
“As for that promissory note—”
Julian grimaced.
“Yes.”
“Don’t mistake being innocent of murder for being innocent.”
“I don’t.”
I think that was the first thoroughly sensible thing I had heard him say.
Eleanor looked at him.
“You will have to put it right.”
“If I can.”
“No.”
Her tone was quiet.
“You will have to put it right whether you can or not.”
Julian looked at her, then nodded.
Their future, I thought, was far from settled.
But she remained beside him.
Major Fenwick came later.
Japp told him enough to clear him formally.
The Major listened without satisfaction.
“So I threatened a murdered man and helped identify his murderer as the murdered man.”
“That about sums it up,” Japp said.
Fenwick’s face was grim.
“I wanted to think the worst of Mercer.”
Poirot looked at him.
“And therefore you saw very clearly what you expected to see.”
Fenwick nodded once.
“That is not an experience I care to repeat.”
He left without another word.
Dr Armand’s securities created less mystery than inconvenience. Once it was established that they had never travelled, the relevant financial records and Rooke’s dealings could be traced without requiring any further railway miracles.
By early evening the boardroom had emptied.
The objects remained.
I looked at them one last time.
The dark coat.
The soft hat.
The gloves.
The cane.
The folded newspaper.
The leather case.
The railway ticket.
And the cup.
It was the cup which held me.
Of all the evidence in that affair, nothing had deceived me more completely.
And nothing, as Poirot would no doubt have argued, had actually deceived me at all.
We left Mercer & Vale together.
Outside, the City was beginning to thin. Clerks hurried toward trains. Newspaper sellers called the evening editions. Motorcars and taxis moved through the streets beneath a sky already turning grey with dusk.
For several minutes we walked without speaking.
Then I said:
“Poirot.”
“Yes, Hastings?”
“I suppose you knew about Rooke quite early.”
“No.”
I was surprised.
“But the arrangement—”
“I knew quite early that the compartment was wrong.”
“Because everything was too neat?”
“Not only neat.”
He looked thoughtful.
“Too expressive.”
I laughed.
“I am not sure that improves matters.”
“The compartment wished very badly to tell us that Sir Claud Mercer had been there.”
“And that made you suspicious?”
“A room does not usually insist upon its occupant.”
I considered this.
“The newspaper?”
“Yes.”
“The tea?”
“Yes.”
“The knee?”
“Very much.”
“The ticket?”
“A useful little liar that never lied.”
I smiled.
“And Rooke?”
“When I saw that the culprit needed access to Sir Claud’s clothes, reservation, correspondence, case and routine, the field became narrow.”
“But the motive?”
“Miss Cole gave us that.”
“And the memorandum?”
“The proof that Rooke had handled what he claimed not to have handled.”
I shook my head.
“I still can’t quite believe I spent an entire day thinking about those signals.”
Poirot said nothing.
“I measured the embankment.”
“Yes.”
“I examined the service road.”
“Yes.”
“I calculated whether a man could safely jump from the train.”
“You were most energetic.”
“I suspected Fenwick knew the railway.”
“Yes.”
“I even brought Julian into it.”
“An impressive achievement.”
I stopped walking.
“Really, Poirot.”
He smiled.
I began laughing.
After a moment he joined me.
“I had searched every mile of railway,” I said, “except Victoria Station.”
Poirot raised a finger.
“Not quite.”
“What now?”
“You searched Victoria Station also.”
I thought of our interviews.
Pym.
Fenwick.
Eleanor.
“That is true.”
“You merely searched it for the wrong man.”
I conceded the point.
We continued toward the cab rank.
At the corner I stopped again.
“There’s one thing.”
“There is always one thing with you, Hastings.”
“The tea.”
“Ah.”
“When I touched that cup on the train, I would have sworn it proved Mercer had been there minutes earlier.”
“Yes.”
“And you knew it didn’t.”
“I knew only that a cup cannot testify beyond its competence.”
“That sounds very judicial.”
“Perhaps the cup was an English cup.”
I ignored this.
“But it was still warm.”
“Yes.”
“So the fact which seemed most important was completely useless.”
Poirot shook his head.
“No, no.”
I looked at him.
“It was extremely useful.”
“How?”
“It taught us the whole case.”
“The tea?”
“The mistake.”
He turned back for a moment toward the dark City building we had just left.
“Every object in that compartment was genuine. The coat belonged to Sir Claud. The cane belonged to Sir Claud. The ticket was properly clipped. The case was his. The tea was truly warm.”
“And yet he was never there.”
“Precisely.”
A taxi drew toward us.
Poirot lifted his hand.
Before entering, he looked at me.
“One may arrange a man’s possessions perfectly, Hastings.”
He paused.
“But one cannot arrange them into a man.”
You have been listening to The Affair of the Empty Compartment, the first case in The New Cases of Hercule Poirot, from the recollections of Captain Arthur Hastings.
An original Chesterton Radio fair-play mystery.
The clues were there from the beginning: the coat, the cane, the ticket, the newspaper—and, most of all, that still-warm cup of tea.
If you enjoyed matching your wits with Poirot, join us again for another case from the notebooks of Captain Hastings.
Until then, from all of us at Chesterton Radio—thank you for listening.